
June 8, 1943: A mob of servicemen block a streetcar on Main Street to remove a passenger wearing a zoot suit.

This was supposed to be an easy – if long – post to wrap up the Zoot Suit Riots. But research took another path, because The Times ignored the first days of the riots. I’m used to The Times making some incredibly dumb news decisions in its history, but not covering these events is still pretty shocking. I can’t imagine what they were thinking.
Anyway, there will be a slight detour into further research. I hope you’ll enjoy the scenic route!
To recap: I decided to take a look at the historical background of the Zoot Suit Riots after seeing “Zoot Suit” in the Los Angeles Conservancy’s Last Remaining Seats series.
In Part 1, we saw that The Times initially treated the zoot suit as a youthful fad, but the attitude changed once zoot suits were outlawed by the War Production Board to conserve fabric.
In Part 2, Times columnist Timothy Turner provided some more sympathetic insight (zoot-suiters aren’t all criminals and delinquents) that was a surprising counterpoint to the mainstream opinion.
In Part 3, we looked at the events leading up to the Zoot Suit Riots of June 1943.
Here’s our story:
On June 2, 1943, immediately preceding the riots, The Times published this account describing a “zoot suit orgy” in which two women were persuaded to go for a ride with a suspect, but were taken to Elysian Park, dragged into the bushes and “attacked.” I’m presuming they were raped, although the usual newspaper euphemism in this era is “criminally attacked.” And yes, The Times identified the victims and published their addresses, as did all newspapers in this era.

Continue reading →