Bernheimer on Pavarotti

Martin Bernheimer reviews Luciano Pavarotti’s recital at Royce Hall, Sept. 25, 1973.

1973_0925_bernheimer_2

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bernheimer on Pavarotti

Matt Weinstock

Matt Weinstock

Sept. 5, 1957

Matt_weinstockd
An Altadena family took off recently on a trip to Europe. The other
day, the next-door neighbor, Ed Murray, was advised by his youngster
that a skunk was trapped in the cement crawl hole at the side of the
vacant house.

Now here was a pretty good dilemma. How do you lure a skunk out of a
3-foot well without, uh, retaliation? There was also the possibility
that the skunk might let go with its defense mechanism through the
screen and under the house, where the memory would linger.

First, Ed decided, you feed it. El skunko cagily ate the lettuce and bread he provided.

Then, while the skunk cowered menacingly in a corner, Ed cautiously
slipped a plank down the well and against the side so it could climb
out. Unfortunately, the skunk refused to walk the plank to freedom.
Apparently it was too steep.

Ed delicately dropped several 2x4s into the well and set the plank on
them to decrease the grade. Next morning, 24 hours later, the skunk was
gone.

Ed will never know if he is the neighborhood benefactor or if the skunk was someone’s pet–deodorized.

ONLY IN L.A.–An
elderly woman on a streetcar was reading a homemade scrapbook of
biblical quotations and religious clippings and Mildred Scott of
Bellflower, sitting next to her, feared she was momentarily in for an
impromptu sermon.

And then, furtively, the woman turned the last page and opened a copy of Confidential concealed under the back cover.

Mildred reports sadly that the old gal focused more intently on paradise lost than she had on paradise gained.

A GENTLEMAN who
wished to talk to an editor was intercepted by an office boy, J. Norman
Bollerup, who later wrote in a memo, "He is an exceptional citizen and
was kind enough to explain to me how he stopped the Korean war."

A MAJOR speculation
once Labor Day is passed is what kind of winter it will be and
weather-conscious folk look for signs and portents in such things as
chipmunks walking bowlegged and cows mooing in B-flat.

This is to report that Ernie Maxwell of Idyllwild anticipates it will
be wet and cold. Something about the way the ants are holding their
mouths, he explains.

MISCELLANY–Lt.
Lee Jones is counting the days until Sept. 14, when he will retire from
the LAPD after 28 years, 21 of them in the crime lab, which he helped
make outstanding nationally. Lee is the fellow who can establish
culpability by studying bits of broken headlight glass or a cloth
imprint on a fender after a hit-run accident or tiny twigs in a
suspect’s trouser cuff after a burglary. He plans to teach scientific
investigation at L.A. State.

Jim Bassett saw a sign on a sports car, "Made in Las Vegas–The Hard Way."

[Note: Leeland "Lee" Jones was at the Black Dahlia crime scene and worked many other cases in conjunction with the crime lab’s Ray Pinker. Jones also wrote a book on forensics. Here’s one of  his cases:]

1943_0416_jones_2

Posted in Columnists, LAPD, Matt Weinstock | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Matt Weinstock

Paul V. Coates–Confidential File

Sept. 5, 1957

Paul_coates
On my desk are some 200 letters, each charging County General Hospital with neglect, indifference and cruelty.

They
were sent to me by former county patients following my recent
reports–both in this column and on television–of some frightening
conditions which existed, and still exist, in the institution.

I believe that the letters were written by sincere people. But I’m not going to print them.

I’m not, because I don’t think it would benefit anyone.

Instead, I’m going to print excerpts from a letter written by a doctor currently employed at General Hospital.

For obvious reasons, I’m not mentioning his name.

"The morning following your latest report," the doctor writes, "there was quite a buzz in the hospital halls.

"The consensus of opinion among the doctors was that the conditions which you presented are essentially true.

"Of
course, there are the usual number of cranks who are unhappy even when
they receive the best of charity, but it is true that many patients
here are neglected.

"The Civil Service bureaucracy is to a great extent the cause.

1957_0905_shoes
"But
the bureaucracy is made up of individual people who are subject to
human traits of the sort which have produced the problem.

"Complex as it is, I  will attempt to analyze the problem.

"The following, I believe, are the reasons and contributing factors for poor patient care at the hospital:

"1–Attitude of the employees toward the patients.

"It
is no secret that many employees are actually aggressive toward
patients. Remarks and conversations can be heard daily, on every floor
of the building, which are resentful of the patients being there.

"2–Not enough help in certain key locations where the patient load is always heavy.

"The admitting room is always crowded and help is insufficient. The X-ray department is another bottleneck.

"3–The hospital facilities are many times overburdened with ineligible patients who seek free medical care.

"Perhaps
these patients are considered eligible by the Social Service
Department, but any outsider who knew their true circumstances would
say ‘No’ to their receiving free medical care.

"This should also include those able to work, but too lazy. Why should they work when charity is so easy to obtain?

"It brings to mind the actual case of a bum who lived by drifting from charity hospital to charity hospital.

"He
had learned to malinger by describing certain symptoms which experience
had taught him would prompt the doctor to keep him in the hospital for
observation.

"He could tell you how the service was in New Orleans, how the food was in Chicago, and so forth.

"4–The type of personnel which applies for Civil Service jobs.

"Time killers often find a good place to kill time in Civil Service. Many employees are putting in time waiting for retirement.

"It’s
difficult to fire a poor employee. This would require close watching to
prove incompetence. The close watching would of necessity be done by a
superior–an older employee who was even closer to retirement, and
perhaps an even better time killer with more experienced years of
loafing behind him.

"A situation like this naturally tends to drive the more competent help away from the hospital.

"5–Poor supervision of employees by superiors.

"Laxity in duties goes uncorrected.

"The chain of authority in many departments is so broken up that it just doesn’t exist in an effective form.

"In
summing up, I should say that while the problem at the hospital is not
new, it seems to be getting worse, rather than better.

"Much of the careless attitude of the lazy employee is learned by other employees and so the contagion spreads unabated."

The doctor’s views aren’t completely shared, of course, by County General Hospital’s administrators.

Tomorrow I’ll report the hospital’s faults, problems and needed corrective measures as seen by the men in charge.

Posted in Columnists, Paul Coates | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Paul V. Coates–Confidential File

Confidential–Tells the Facts and Names the Names

Scenes from the Confidential trial:

Sept. 4, 1957, Dorothy Dandridge testifies

Confidential_dandridge_1957_0904_mc
Photograph by Dan McCormack, Los Angeles Times

Continue reading →

Posted in #courts, 1957, Crime and Courts, Film, Hollywood, Music, Photography | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Confidential–Tells the Facts and Names the Names

Mystery photo

See if you can identify this gentleman from The Times photo archives.
(Hint: He’s not Arnold Stang).

Mystery_photo_no1_2

Email me

Guesses so far: Telly Savalas.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Paul V. Coates–Confidential File

Sept. 4, 1957

Paul_coates_2
The city of New York stands in armed terror today.

Its terrorists are kids–the children of its adults.

With knives and guns and razors they have sliced and blasted open the heart of the biggest metropolis in the United States.

The terror was a long time coming.

And the cure is probably a long and expensive time away.

It scares me. Even though New York is 3,000 miles away, it scares me.

Partly because I read this week about the juvenile gang murder of an 18-year-old girl on L.A.’s South Side.

Partly because I know our juvenile problem is not lessening.

And partly because I know that we–as a city and a county–are headed
100% in the wrong direction in taking any precautions. And we don’t
seem to care.

Recently, the County Probation Department was the victim of an unfortunate budget slash, apparently inspired by us, the people.

We gave them less money to operate. We granted them no new staff.

And then we told them to take over Juvenile Hall. We tossed them an
extra forestry camp to staff and operate. And we pulled all juvenile
traffic cases away from police agencies and shoved them into their lap.

The added load, of course, makes efficiency a near-impossibility.

But the tragedy is born in what the Probation Department is going to
have to do to meet it, to stretch its already strained staff.

It is going to wipe out its only section focused strictly on prevention.

1957_0902_mirror
And the prevention service it rendered was that of deterring gang warfare.

The section is (by the end of the month, we can use the past tense)
known as Group Guidance. It includes 11 deputy probation officers who
move into juvenile trouble areas and work with the groups of kids we
distastefully refer to as "gangs" and "rat packs."

Recommended case load per officer is two areas. Some officers carry three or four.

Their approach is a broad and intelligent one. They don’t move into an
area with a "meet me here and we’ll start a club" attitude. They’re
pros–highly skilled, highly educated, highly trained.

They work with individual kids as individuals–trying to change the
leaders, to break up the "group-mind" which germinates in gangs.

They also work with community organizations and leaders to get them to
shoulder some of the responsibility and to change their often aloof and
disdainful attitudes toward juvenile troublemakers.

And, though they don’t admit it, they’ve been directly responsible for
breaking down hate barriers between numerous police officers and the
kids.

That, possibly, is the most ticklish and important job of all.

Kids with no respect for police have no respect for law or for society.
And too often our "officers of peace" prefer to employ rousting and
harassing techniques rather than try to find a meeting ground built on
a little understanding.

I have, over the years, watched Group Guidance officers in action.

I’ve considered some of their accomplishments plain miracles.

They work doctors’ hours. They get into the homes. They help the kids’
parents fill out income tax forms. They find jobs for the kids. They
loan them money. They help them out of some embarrassing scrapes.

Yet, all the time they’re working to instill social responsibility into
them, to give them confidence, as individuals and as a group–and to
channel it constructively.

But I’d hate to tell you how much they’re getting paid for their sweat.

Instead, I’ll just say that if they can save just two kids a year from
one-year jail terms they are more than repaying us taxpayers their
salary.

When a Group Guidance officer moves into a new area, he usually finds
that between 50-100% of the kids are on probation and parole.

The duration of his stay is determined by the drop in the percentage.

I remember one officer, Al Collier, who stepped into a rough section
where 75% of juveniles were on probation and parole a few years ago.

When he was pulled out to enter another area, the percentage was down to 10.

Logic dictates that the man not only saved money for our community but also saved some people from very personal grief.

But, when penny pinching’s involved, logic often gets tossed out the window.

Besides, we’ll be needing the money to build bigger and better prisons.

Posted in Columnists, Paul Coates | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Paul V. Coates–Confidential File

Remembering Tony Day

The Times, 1970

1970_0705_masthead_2

And I found this, which was far too interesting not to share:

Sept. 26, 1971, by Nick B. Williams

1971_0926

Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Remembering Tony Day

Oops!

1957_0904_confidential

Sept. 4, 1957

Los Angeles

1957_0904_ohara
On a field trip to Grauman’s Chinese Theater so that the court could visit the notorious Row 35, where Maureen O’Hara’s alleged tryst occurred, jurors discovered that it was really Row 40. Aisle C.

Upon
being shown to the seats, La Guerre Drouet, the juror whose request
prompted the trip, tried to reenact O’Hara’s alleged encounter with a
Mexican lover, cuddling and writhing with an imaginary companion. "For
several moments, the juror turned and tried various poses as he
recalled defense testimony as to what allegedly happened," The Times
said.

Back in court, wearing a blue-striped white cotton dress, turned-up white straw hat and "90-cent pearl earrings," O’Hara
made her entrance, vowing "Up the Irish!" On the stand, she insisted
that the incident never occurred, noting that she was out of the
country when the alleged encounter took place.

Defense Attorney Arthur J. Crowley attacked her testimony on several
fronts. He first tried to show that O’Hara had been out on the town
with Mexican millionaire Enrique Parra. Crowley displayed a news
photograph of the two of them at a nightclub and when O’Hara said she
couldn’t recall where it was taken, Crowley attempted to demonstrate
that her memory was unclear on where the two of them had gone.

When Judge Herbert V. Walker barred that line of questioning, Crowley
examined whether O’Hara had ever been to the Chinese Theater.
O’Hara said she had only gone to the theater for several premieres ("The Robe," September 1953; "Prince Valiant," April 1954), and was always accompanied by a relative.

When a series of questions establishing Parra’s identity concluded in
whether they had ever been to Grauman’s Chinese Theater, O’Hara
replied: "Never!"

1957_0904_dandridgeCrowley’s final effort was to show that publicity from the Confidential
article and the resulting trial had been good for her career. O’Hara
said she hadn’t been offered a job since the story was published (her
next movie was "Our Man in Havana," released in 1959) and described her
daughter Bronwyn crying herself to sleep because children at school
were talking about the scandal.

Dorothy Dandridge
also testified, disputing a purported incident described in the
Confidential story "What Dorothy Dandridge Did in the Woods," involving
white band leader Daniel Terry that supposedly occurred when she was
appearing at Lake Tahoe.

Lake Tahoe placed so many restrictions on African Americans that she
spent most of her time in her suite, Dandridge said. "I worked nights
and slept in the afternoon," she said.

When asked if she had ever ridden in a car with Terry, Dandridge
replied: "I couldn’t have been seen with Mr. Terry in a prejudiced
place like Lake Tahoe."

Fashion note: Dandridge wore a beige linen suit with a white artificial corsage at her shoulder, The Times said.

Email me

Posted in #courts, Film, Hollywood, Television | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Oops!

Countdown to Watts

Yes, it really happened.

1957_0904_cover

Posted in Countdown to Watts, Front Pages | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Countdown to Watts

Paul V. Coates–Confidential File

Sept. 3, 1957

Paul_coates
SUBJECT’S NAME: Linda Lee Morrell

SUBJECT’S DESCRIPTION: Age, 14.
Height, 5 feet, 3 inches. Weight, 110 pounds. Blue eyes. Fair hair.
Subject has mole on left cheek and scar under left eyebrow.

Anyone with information as to
subject’s whereabouts is requested to contact her mother, Mrs. Pat
Morrell, 10515 Haines Cayon, Ave., Tujunga, FL orida 3-6564.

There are women who enjoy crying in front of strangers.

And there are women who don’t.

And it’s my personal, biased estimate that 80% of those who break down
in front of reporters do so for reasons other than misery or suffering.

For centuries, women have neither underestimated nor underplayed the power of their tears.

But there’s also the 20%. The minority who try to hold back so hard
that you find yourself wishing they’d cry, before they explode.

It’s this category in which I put Mrs. Patricia Morrell.

She came in a few days ago to tell me about Linda Lee.

With controlled calm, she explained that maybe a story in the paper might help locate her daughter.

"It’s over 14 weeks now she’s been gone," she told me.

"It was May 23, a Thursday. I got up as usual–to go to work at 6. That is, I leave home at 6.

"Like every day, I woke her up just a little bit. I said ‘Goodbye, honey. Be a good girl.’

"And she said, ‘All right, Mommy. I’ll see you this afternoon.’ "

Mrs. Morrell blinked.

"I always picked her up after school," she explained.

"But I got there after work and didn’t see her. Then one of the girls came up to me. ‘Are you looking for Linda?’ she asked me.

"I said I was and she said, ‘She didn’t show up today, Mrs. Morrell.’

1957_0903_morrell_mug
"So I thought maybe she was sick, but she always called me at work if
she was sick. I guess I just didn’t know. I hurried home, of course,
but she wasn’t there…."

Mrs. Morrell reached into her handbag while describing her search. Then suddenly, she was talking about the night before.

"Linda was making some drapes for a friend of mine at work. I mentioned to her, ‘Why don’t you call Daddy?’

"He’s in Texas. We’ve been divorced nine years.

"So she said, ‘That’s an idea.’ You see, we were going to take a
vacation in June and she was going to visit him. She called and had a
nice talk and worked some more on the drapes.

"She’s a very good housekeeper. She cooks and irons and she’s getting
to be a very good seamstress. She’s better than I am at things like
that."

A handkerchief was in Mrs. Morrell’s hand now, and her eyes were blinking regularly.

"We did so many things together–almost like we were sisters. Swimming, skating, going to church, going to dances.

"There was really nothing you’d call family quarrels. Very seldom I’d have to scold her. Sometimes I’d get scolded, too."

I turned my head and Mrs. Morrell made a quick motion to her eyes.

"I suppose I should tell you that another girl left the same day. But she was in a fight.

"They told me that Linda was at the fight, too, but she didn’t actually
fight. Just two other girls. So I learned she had started to school,
anyway, because the fight was right by the school.

"I don’t know what to think. I know she’s all right, but if she is, why doesn’t she call me?

"I’m her mother and we’re so… Maybe, do you suppose she’s scared?"

On the word "scared" Mrs. Morrell’s voice broke. And the tears came.

She looked at me and asked:

"Why should a girl be scared of her mother?"

[Note: The Times reported that Linda might have left Los Angeles with Carol Curl, 13, but never followed up on the story of the missing girls–lrh.]

Posted in Columnists, Paul Coates | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Paul V. Coates–Confidential File

How to Get–and Keep–a Husband

1957_0903_constance

Aug, 31-Sept. 3, 1957

Los Angeles

If it’s true that a woman without a man is like a fish without a
bicycle, then author Kate Constance wants every salmon to have a
Schwinn. She’s written a book on the subject, "How to Get and Keep a Husband," which is being serialized in the Mirror.

In Parts 6 and 7, Constance tells the fish where to meet bicycles and how to get dates!

How to meet a bicycle? Well, dear fish, the first challenge is to meet the right one, for there are many bad bicycles out there! 

The good news is that you needn’t move to another city just to find a
fresh crop of bikes. In fact, many fish make the mistake of moving
around the country prospecting for the lode of marriage prospects.
Constance says: Stop it! And here’s why:

"Many women who have gone to strange cities have confided in me that
their only means of meeting men is by pickups. These easy-come, easy-go
encounters usually result in futile, unhappy associations.

1957_0903_girdle

"The practice of the pickup has become increasingly prevalent in this
country, even tried by ‘nice’ girls who are desperate for
companionship. Almost any man who smiles at them across a bar or opens
his car door at the corner is acceptable. The prestige of women
generally has been lowered in the eyes of men by this practice.

"Frankly confused by the behavior of the opposite sex, men are often at
a loss about what women want and expect in standards of conduct, for
while they expect the treatment due a lady they nevertheless behave
like immoral women."

(At right, a courtship ritual of the 1950s: wearing a girdle and playing the castanets).

So how does the fish meet a nice bicycle? You might try selling swank
shirts in your spare time. We know one fish who did that and met a
marvelous bike. Another fish sold pipes in her spare time and in no
time was married to a wealthy tobacco grower. Still another used her
vacation time volunteering in politics and is now married to the mayor!
Two sisters volunteered with the local opera company. One of the fish
bagged an operatic tenor, the other went on tour and netted an European
nobleman!

You might also take up a trade that puts you in contact with lots of nice,
eligible bikes, Constance says. You could be a manicurist, drugstore
clerk or elevator operator. There’s also secretarial work, bookkeeping
and clerking.

Don’t forget, dear fish, that it’s the responsibility of married fish
to help their single sisters. It’s quite likely that you may become
friends with a nice couple who will introduce you to one of their
single bike friends.

One word of warning, dear fish: Do NOT flirt with your girlfriends’ husbands or bad things will happen.

"No matter how trivial or how much in jest, abstain from familiarities
of word or action with your friend’s husband. There should be nothing
to suggest even the slightest interest in the husband beyond what you
might evince toward a business acquaintance in your office.

"I have seen single women after taking a couple of drinks make fools of
themselves with silly, although perhaps meaningless, passes at the
husbands of their friends. As a result, they were ostracized from those
circles."

Oh my!

Now that you have met an eligible bicycle, how do you get him to ask you out? Certainly not with a pickup!

The secret, dear fish, is that bicycles crave the spotlight. If you put
a bike at center stage he’s already where you want him! Just don’t let
him know he’s being hunted.

Here’s a case study:

Over six months, a fish rode the elevator with an attractive bicycle.
One rainy morning, when the two of them had the elevator to themselves,
she noticed he was wearing a bright red tie and said: "Every man could
brighten up these rainy days if he wore a good-looking tie like that.
I’ll bet your wife suggested that one."

This was a two-step process in which the shrewd fish could be cheerful and find out if the bicycle was married. 

 "Oh, I’ve got a jillion," said the unsuspecting bicycle. "A jillion
ties and no wife. I have ties from many parts of the world. Sort of a
hobby."

"Where did that one come from?" asked the fish. "Let me guess."

"Think about it," he suggested. "I’ll see if you guess right when I come out for coffee at 10:30."

So at 10:30 he came by. They went to coffee and she made several guesses (wrong every time, can you believe it?).

OK, so they didn’t get married but they had some nice dates and she
eventually married his brother, who presumably didn’t have a neckwear
fetish.

Here are some of Constance’s do’s and don’ts for dating:

1. Use "sweet feminine mystery." Constance invokes the "Mona Lisa": "I dare you to come hither–but don’t touch!"

2. Use moderation. Expensive looks and lavish talk frighten a bicycle.

3. Be nice, be reserved, be classy. Don’t be a smart-mouthed fish and don’t be too talkative or he’ll think you’re dumb or foolish.

4. Be gracious. Don’t be a snob or he’ll think you’re judging him, too.

5. Look good. Femininity is
more than classic features and expensive clothes, Constance says. "She
who is womanly, dainty and clean and elegantly fragrant sums up the
basic feminine appeal."

Hints for getting beyond the first date:

1957_0903_mocambo
A bicycle asks a fish for a second date if she makes him feel
comfortable and relaxed, she’s understanding and sympathetic, she’s
considerate and she looks good.

And what about the bedroom?

Constance has some very 1957 advice for the fish:

"Any realistic view of the problem recognizes the element of sex. This
stimulates and elevates the relationship if retained in proper
proportion. But it cheapens and more often destroys the meaningful part
of a friendship if allowed to get out of control.

" ‘Sexual satisfaction’ is omitted from this list because a man of good
standards does not include free love in his dating requisites."

And what if a bicycle expects sex after several dates? Drop him and
don’t lose a bit of sleep over it, Constance says! Why? Because, dear
fish, that’s your marriage bait, she says.

"She should lure him with a certain amount of physical attractiveness
but withhold all sexual compliance as the logical reward of marriage."

[Note: In case there is any doubt, let me add: As with the horoscopes, this is for entertainment purposes only.–lrh]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on How to Get–and Keep–a Husband

Experiment?

Sept. 3, 1957
Los Angeles

1957_0903_rawson

Posted in 1957 | Comments Off on Experiment?

What is THAT?

Sept. 3, 1957
Los Angeles

1957_0903_edsel02

Posted in Transportation | Tagged , , | Comments Off on What is THAT?

Judith Mae Andersen update

A little more research in the Judith Mae Andersen case has unearthed some interesting facts about the bucket used to dispose of her head and other remains.

Recall that Chicago
police officials said the bucket was so rare that they couldn’t find
another one to show prospective witnesses. There’s a good reason:
En-Ar-Co motor oil was sold in Canada.

A website I found through Google Canada provided the following information:

This style of bucket was used from about 1939 (or the late 1940s) to 1952.

Here’s the bucket from the killing:

1957_0921_trib_andersen_can

And here are some modern photos. Note that the buckets are bright, industrial yellow (easier to spot in Lake Michigan than, for example, a black bucket):

Photo 1

Enarco_manequin_can

Photo 2

Enarco_cans_collection

I’ve e-mailed the two collectors to see if I can get a better picture.

Stay tuned.

Email me

Posted in Homicide, Judith Mae Andersen | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Judith Mae Andersen update

Wheel-o-meal

 

1957_0902_scrivner

Sept. 2, 1957

Los Angeles

1957_0902_scrivner_mug
Let’s suppose you’re a clever businessman. And let’s suppose your city
has the nation’s busiest intersection: In three days, 205,022 cars pass
through Wilshire Boulevard and Western Avenue. Along with nine
horse-drawn milk wagons.

Horses? You see, it’s 1928, and Charles Wesley Scrivner, who died Sept.
1, 1957, is going to build a drive-in at Wilshire and Western.

Or so it says in Scrivner’s obituary in The Times, which reported that
he opened one of the nation’s first drive-ins in 1928 at Wilshire and
Western, and the Mirror, which declared it to be the first in the
country.

Tracking down the truth is a little more difficult. The Times lists
several early drive-in restaurants (southwest corner of Crenshaw and
Vernon, July 27, 1930; northeast corner of Beverly and Rosemont, Sept.
21, 1930; Coffee Cup Drive-In Cafe, 9180 W. Pico July 26, 1931; Bogen’s
3201 Wilshire at Vermont, 1933).

The Times also wrote about several drive-in markets in the period
(Hollywood and Kingsley, March 4, 1928; Camden and Brighton, June 10,
1928; Sunset near Western, July 1, 1928; 6th Street between Alexandria
and Kenmore, Oct. 21, 1928; Western and Florence, Dec. 16, 1928). But
again, nothing at Wilshire and Western.

What do know is that Scrivner came to Los Angeles in 1912 and was a
salesman for Meek-Barnes Baking Co. In 1921, he helped found 4-S Baking
Co. with Frederick G. Scalzo and two unidentified men who presumably
had an S in their names. The company was sold to Interstate Bakeries
Corp. in 1930.

Scrivner opened the drive-in with Harry Carpenter, who ran a chain of
drive-ins bearing his name. Scrivner was also on the boards of Henry’s
Drive-Ins and Hody’s Restaurants and was a part owner of Thriftimart
groceries.

Scrivner, 66, was a 32nd-degree Mason and a member of Al Malaikah Shrine Temple.

As for the story of the purported Wilshire/Western Drive-In, presumably
it’s serving burgers and malts in L.A. history heaven. If you have any
more information, let me know.

Bonus fact: Harry Carpenter killed himself with a shotgun blast to the
chest, July 24, 1954, while sitting on the steps to his basement at 625
Cumberland Road, Glendale. He was 67.

Bonus fact: According to the 1928 traffic survey, 1,388 trucks went
through Western on Wilshire in 24 hours, even though trucks were
supposedly banned on Wilshire.

Email me

Below, The Times rants about Los Angeles’ traffic problems in 1928. As I keep saying, Los Angeles’ traffic problems go back at least a century and defy simple answers.

1928_226_traffic_2

Posted in Food and Drink, Transportation | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Wheel-o-meal

Great moments in advertising

1957_0830_ad

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Great moments in advertising

Literary diversions

The Times pans "On the Road," Oct. 4, 1957. "The Deadbeat Generation?" Ouch.

1957_1004_kerouac

Continue reading →

Posted in books | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Back to school

 

1957_0828_fashion

Aug. 28, 1957

Los Angeles

It’s almost time for school to open, parents, so here’s some tips in shopping for new clothes. And there’s lots to cheer about!

"Boys are turning their backs on the sloppy, bizarre clothing fads
that once had parents and teachers alike in a state of shock," says
Bill Holzhauser, men’s fashion editor at the Mirror. "This year, when
they answer the school bell, most of them will be dressing right in
neater and more handsome outfits."

 

1957_0828_boys_fashions_2

What’s in for boys? Think Ivy League. The lads have come to their
senses and are starting to abandon those awful, scruffy blue jeans,
thank heavens, in favor of neat, trim Ivy League trousers–at least for
school. "Cavalry twill trousers styled in the Ivy fashion" are selling
well, stores report.

And if your boys are hard on their clothes (aren’t they all?) try the
miracle Klondike cloth. It’s the toughest fabric known to mankind and
was developed for the Army, which knows a few things about back to school wear, especially in Little Rock, Ark.!

Shirts go Ivy as well, in plaids and checks with button-down collars,
and complete the look with a bulky, shapeless cardigan sweater!

This year’s fashion crime for boys: Long coats are in. The Eisenhower jacket is as dead as Mussolini!

 

1957_0828_girls_fashions

For girls, think Chanel, says Jean Gallagher, the Mirror’s fashion editor:

"Dresses with complementary Orlon or wool sweaters (often trimmed with
appliques of the dress fabric) should be popular with the littlest set.
So should plaid cotton dresses and jumpers of all types.

"With high school girls, the influence is that of the easy, casual
attitude initiated by French designer Chanel. This means jackets with
square shoulders worn open over blouses or sweaters… pleated
skirts…brass buttons and gobs of golden chain jewelry."

And moms, don’t forget "Gimmick belts with all kinds of dangles, sloppy
Joe Shetland sweaters, pop-it pearls that are dyed to match sweater
colors and anything nautical."

 

1957_0926_little_rock

Above, what the smartly dressed teens of Little Rock, Ark.’s Central High are wearing back to school.

Email me

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Back to school

Paul V. Coates–Confidential File

Aug. 30, 1957

Paul_coates
By sundown today, condemned killer Billy Rupp may find his life saved by the same jurors who, five years ago, ordered his death.

In a move unprecedented in penal annals, five of the Rupp case jury
members have signed affidavits in a last-ditch attempt to spare him
from San Quentin’s gas chamber next Friday.

Four more are expected to join them by nightfall.

Their affidavits state:

"I would not have voted for the death penalty had it been known to me
that there was a method whereby William Francis Rupp could be
incarcerated for life without possibility of parole."

The statements are to be given to Gov. Goodwin Knight, the last man between the 23-year-old Yorba Linda beekeeper and death.

The appeal of the jurors is not one outlined in the state law books.

It is, rather, a moral plea by persons who didn’t want Rupp, the slayer
of Ruby Ann Payne, 15-year-old babysitter, to walk the streets of
society again, but who were offered no choice other than a death
verdict to prevent him from doing so.

California statutes do not permit a jury to sentence a person to life imprisonment with no possibility of parole.

1952_0809_payne
So, without this choice, the eight women and four men who heard Rupp’s
case took the only course they felt would protect society.

And, in August of 1952, they found him guilty of first-degree murder. Their silent, automatic verdict was death.

At the time, Rupp was declared legally sane.

But testimony by private psychiatrists and physicians that the youth
was organically and mentally deranged was not allowed into the court
record because of the wide breech between legal and medical definitions
of insanity.

Six time since his first execution date was set, Rupp has won stays on
appeals through the courts. One of them came only 15 minutes before he
was due to die.

But one by one, all avenues of appeal were blocked off.

His final chance–a petition for a writ of certiorari before the U.S.
Supreme Court–is expected to be turned down within a few days.

It leaves only Gov. Knight between Billy Rupp and death.

And it was this realization which, just two days ago, sparked a
dramatic search for the 12 jurors who five years ago doomed an
18-year-old boy with a brain damaged in infancy to death.

The search was started by Santa Ana attorneys George Chula and James C.
Monroe, two of the four volunteer defense lawyers now working the case.

With the aid of Pat Michaels, news editor of the Santa Ana Radio
Station KWIZ, they located nearly all of the jurors. Michaels put out
hourly appeals for the jurors to contact the attorneys.

Then Chula, with his firm’s special investigator, Jim Burton, talked to those contacted.

"Once we had explained the situation," Chula told me, "the jurors were more than happy to sign the affidavits."

Among the first to sign was Mrs. Lucille Lanford of Santa Ana, who five
years ago held out against a death verdict for 28 1/2 hours before
giving in "to fatigue and other pressures."

"At the time," she told Chula yesterday, "I believed that in certain
cases the death penalty was all right. With Rupp, our choice was either
to kill him or leave it to chance that he might be turned free again in
the future.

"But now," she added, "this whole case has me so mixed up, I don’t think I even believe in capital punishment any more."

Juror Thomas O’Brien of Buena Park stated:

"I’m doing it purely in the interests of justice. I hope it will do some good."

1952_0813_rupp

Chula, who interrupted his vacation in the East to return to the case,
stated that all of the former jurors who signed affidavits said they
knew that Rupp, discharged from a mental institution at the age of 14,
was "not normal."

It’s something that psychiatrists, physicians and the boy’s own father,
William Francis Rupp Sr., had insisted long before the boy committed
his almost inevitable crime.

Dr. Samuel Marcus, an L.A. psychiatrist called in to treat the boy when
he was 14, had predicted that Rupp, if not taken out of society, would
commit a major crime.

Posted in Columnists, Paul Coates | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Paul V. Coates–Confidential File

How to Get–and Keep–a Husband

1957_0830_constance

Aug. 30, 1957

Los Angeles

If it’s true that a woman without a man is like a fish without a
bicycle, then author Kate Constance wants every salmon to have a
Schwinn. She’s written a book on the subject, "How to Get and Keep a Husband," which is being serialized in the Mirror.

In Part 5, Constance tells the aspiring fish how to snare a bicycle
without arousing his delicate suspicions. And she also advises the fish
on preparing herself for marriage–especially if she is forced to keep
working!

For the fact is, dear fish, that the bicycle is, by nature, a hunter
and hates to feel hunted by a fish intent on marriage. Nothing is more
likely to chase away a prospective bike than a wily, scheming fish,
Constance writes.

1957_0830_recipe
"Men are usually afraid of the wary-eyed matrimonial huntress,"
Constance writes.  "Marrying should be right at the top of a woman’s
thought processes, but she had better not let the man know it!" she
says.

Consider this comment from
a wary but eligible bicycle: "I am not keen about making new female
friends. Ninety-nine out of 100 start putting their claws into a man
and try to hold him fiercely to the path toward marriage if he so much
as asks them out to dinner or a dance now and then. It would be so
refreshing if women treated new men friends as intelligent beings and
not just dumb brutes standing around waiting to be taken into marriage."

First, Constance gives a few don’ts:

1. Don’t use your bicycle as a convenient escort or errand boy.

2. Don’t use your bicycle as a meal ticket or way out of a crummy job.

And a few do’s to prepare the fish for married life:

1. A married fish must be prepared to give more than she receives.

    "With that realistic outlook, she will not be disillusioned
by the demands that necessarily come with a wedding ring. She never
should expect marriage to solve any financial, emotional or social
problems," Constance writes.

2. If the fish must continue to work after marriage, she must be gracious.

    "Brutal but true is the fact that many working wives
sadistically enjoy needling their husbands over the fact that they are
‘forced’ to work outside the home," Constance writes.

    "If the bride decides to continue working, she should do it
graciously, never reminding her husband that her paycheck is necessary
for many of the luxuries or near-luxuries she craves. Even if she has
to work for the basic necessities, she should keep her mouth shut on
the subject if she wants a successful marriage."

[Note: In case there is any doubt, let me add: As with the horoscopes, this is for entertainment purposes only.–lrh]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment