Smog

Greg Armento, history librarian at Cal State Long Beach, dropped me a
note about early uses of "smog" in The Times. He noted that on March 29, 1914, The
Times said:

"[Kokomo Times:] The esteemed Weather Bureau has sprung a
new
one. It is the word ‘smog,’ and it means smoke and fog. The bureau

explains
that very frequently there are times when this mixture is

apparent in the
atmosphere, and it considers the new  word a great

little idea.

"Very
well, ‘smog’ let it be. But why end there? Let’s call a mixture of

snow and
mud ‘smud.’ A mixture of  snow and soot ‘snoot,’ and a mixture

of snow and
hail ‘snail.’ Thus we might have a weather forecast:

"Snail today,
turning to snoot tonight; tomorrow smoggy with smud."

1905_0730_smog
Of course Proquest is a wonderful tool for such research on language.
And with just a bit of digging, we can find even earlier references to
smog. A July 30, 1905, article in the Chicago Daily Tribune credits the
word to Dr. Des Voeux of London’s Coal Smoke Abatement Society.

According to the wire service article from the New York Herald, Des
Voeux proposed the word at a public health congress held in London to
discuss the city’s polluted air. According the article, Des Voeux said
the name of London should be changed to "Smog" because the air was so
dirty.

"If the obsolete kitchen fire were abolished there would be less smog,"
the article says. "In fact, Des Voeux professed to be able to detect
three distinct diurnal smogs–breakfast, lunch and dinner smogs." His
novel solution was to use the London underground as a gigantic exhaust
system to pump out pollution and bring in fresh air.

Des Voeux is sometimes given credit for coining the term, but alas, as
soon as we crown him with this accomplishment, we must snatch it away,
for there are even earlier usages.

A Jan. 19, 1893, article in the Los Angeles Times credits an unidentified "witty English writer":

"The fact that the death rate of
London has recently almost doubled, going to over thirty in the
thousand, is sufficient attestation of the evil effects of the dense,
black fog which hung over that city for six consecutive days not long
ago.

These visitations, which a witty English writer once designated by the
name "smog," represent a condition of the atmosphere when it is
saturated with moisture and charged with soot and the fumes of sulfur
and carbonic acid gas from the chimneys and smokestacks of the great
city. It has long been known that they are harbingers of disease.

Not long ago, a story writer of the grewsome school published a
sketch in which he had all the people of London suffocated in one of
these fogs, with the exception of one man who made his escape by using
a Yankee device for manufacturing ozone."

As interesting as all this may be, the waxing and waning popularity of
the "N-word" in The Times over the years is a far more fascinating and
relevant pursuit. I hope to write more about the "N-word" in a later
post, for it went in and out of fashion regularly, nearly disappearing from
the paper during World War I and vanishing for several years during World War II.

Email me

About lmharnisch

I am retired from the Los Angeles Times
This entry was posted in Environment and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.