Apollo’s Unseen Titan

   
  
July 17, 1969, Cover

July 17, 1969: Apollo Speeds on Its Incredible Quest.

COLUMN ONE

Apollo's Unseen Titan

Without Gene Kranz to guide him, Neil Armstrong might never have landed on the moon. The obscure but fiery flight director made the crisis decisions that helped the American folk hero make history.


July 3, 1994

By ROBERT LEE HOTZ, TIMES SCIENCE WRITER

HOUSTON — Of the sounds humanity has made on Earth, only a nuclear explosion is louder than the unthrottled thunder of the Saturn rockets that carried men to the moon.

On July 16, 1969, when a Saturn lifted the Apollo 11 capsule free of Earth on its historic journey to the moon, one man hundreds of miles from the launch pad in Florida felt its apocalyptic energy reverberate in his marrow: NASA Flight Director Gene Kranz, on the edge of his seat in the windowless "trench" of NASA's Mission Control in Houston.

July 18, 1969, Cover Neil Armstrong, the Apollo 11 commander, was the first human to walk on the moon. Kranz was the man who guided him the last miles onto its dusty, pockmarked surface.

Of America's secular heroes, few stir the spirit as deeply as the astronauts who a generation ago left the first footsteps on the moon.

But few ever knew the names or the stories of the faceless, can-do engineers who directed them there safely.

If Armstrong–the Apollo astronaut whose features were masked by his mirrored helmet–was the public image of American space prowess, Kranz–the hard-charging flight director–was its private face.

Armstrong was a paragon of Protestant test pilot cool: terse, aloof, unknowable. He was a blue-eyed Eagle Scout with a hesitant, lopsided grin, so shy that there are almost no clear pictures of him standing on the moon's surface, only photographs of his footprints and his shadow. He declined to be interviewed for this story, as he declines almost all interview requests.

Kranz was unabashedly sentimental, a fierce agency loyalist who played Sousa marches in his office to pump up his adrenaline. He relished his in-house reputation as a relentless taskmaster who earned the nickname "General Savage."

Today–25 years after the moon landing–Armstrong is still a national folk hero. Kranz is virtually unknown outside an inner circle of NASA veterans.

What they share is the stuff of history–a journey given only once to the human race.

Both men were born in small Ohio towns barely 100 miles apart at the bottom of the Depression. Both were fighter pilots in the 1950s. They never met until they joined NASA. They never spoke directly during the moon mission. They almost never speak now.

July 19, 1969, Cover They were never so close as when they were farthest apart–when Armstrong, 240,000 miles from Earth, was searching for a safe landing site only a few miles above the moon, with capsule emergency alarms flashing, the on-board computer on the verge of a breakdown, and only scant minutes left before the landing fuel ran out.

For those 13 minutes of the lunar descent, half a billion people held their breath.

The efforts of 300,000 technicians, the labor of eight years at a cost of $25 billion, a Cold War rivalry, and a murdered President's promise hung in the balance.

When Armstrong set the lunar lander down safely, the national victory was so complete that for decades the Soviet government would officially deny that there had even been a race to the moon.

It was Kranz–in a locked control room with a dozen young engineers relaying data buzzing in the earphones of his headset–who decided to override the alarms and give Armstrong the chance to land the spacecraft on the moon.

*

Gene Kranz had a style all his own.

There was the frown, of course. Human nature gave him that. His voice had a flat Midwestern edge that, even at its friendliest, retained a hard edge of reflexive command.

July 20, 1969, Cover Then there was that blond bristle of a crew cut, shaved so close you could see the muscles tighten at the back of his skull when he concentrated. He owed the style to the Air Force and the close trim to a barber in Clear Lake, Tex.

"I was the most emotional of the flight directors," Kranz, 61, said in a recent interview. "Space really got me all honked up."

Kranz has the kind of mind that seems happiest when it is running a dozen trains of thought along parallel tracks–the sort of fellow, friends say, who relaxes by working on a full-scale aerobatic biplane in his garage, pruning prize roses and baking bread all in one afternoon.

As the flight director for the Apollo 11 landing–and head of NASA's entire flight control operations branch–he made $21,432 a year. That was enough to raise six children. Five work in the space program.

But it was the vests his wife made that set him off from everybody else in mission operations.

Before each mission, Marta Kranz scoured the fabric shops of Houston for a bold swatch of material to sew into one of his special flight vests. They became as much a part of the early space program as splashdown cigars and ticker tape parades.

Today, Kranz still has 15 vests in an upstairs closet of the modest home the couple moved to when NASA set up operations in Houston.

July 21, 1969, Cover He proudly lays them out on the sofa for a visitor: Paisley brocades. Silver and gold lame. Carnival stripes. Velvet.

The simplest–a plain white silk twill vest yellowed now to ivory–is what he wore for Apollo 11.

White was the color reserved for the leader of the White Flight, as his flight director's shift was known within mission operations.

White Flight was in charge of the lunar landing.

When Kranz retired this year, NASA also retired the color.

*

As a boy in Toledo, Ohio, Kranz never cared much about rocket ships or spaceflight. But as a military pilot in the Pacific in 1957, he was impressed by the way the launch of the Russian Sputnik galvanized people around the world.

A few years after he was discharged–working as a test engineer at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico–he saw an ad in Aviation Week magazine. The government wanted engineers for a fledgling space task group being organized at the federal flight research facility in Langley, Va.

He didn't hesitate.

"I just felt that space was the next thing coming in aviation," he said. "It was higher, faster. It had t
he risk."

July 22, 1969, Cover Before he knew exactly what was happening, he found himself on a plane headed for Cape Canaveral, Fla., with orders to prepare for the first unmanned test of the Mercury Redstone rocket that would later carry the first American–Alan B. Shepard–into space.

"They said, 'Go down to the Cape and write us a countdown.' They put me on an airplane. I had never written a countdown," Kranz said, referring to the complex engineering procedures that lead up to a rocket launch. "I landed at Patrick Air Force Base and didn't even know which way the Cape was.

"There was a guy there in a Chevy Malibu with a surfboard in the back. He says: 'What are you looking for?' I said: 'I got to go out to the Cape.' He said: 'Hop in.' So boom, off we go. I didn't even bother to ask who he was.

"About two-thirds of the way out there I found out it was Mercury astronaut Gordon Cooper. That was my introduction to the original seven astronauts," he said.

When the moment for liftoff came, the Redstone rocket died on the launch pad.

That was his introduction to spaceflight.

*

When Kranz signed up for the space race, he was 27 years old. NASA was still in the making. There was no organized civilian space program to speak of.

 There was no such thing as Mission Control. People like Kranz, his mentor–a short, icy engineer named Christopher Columbus Kraft, the agency's first flight director–and operations chief Walt Williams built it from the raw material of their own personalities and engineering styles.

July 23, 1969, Cover At the apex of the structure they created through trial and error stood the flight director–a single person with absolute authority over operations during a space mission.

He had ultimate control when a manned space capsule was in orbit–and ultimate responsibility if a technical mishap resulted in the death of an astronaut crew.

In the end, it was the flight director's decision to abort a mission–or to proceed in the face of engineering uncertainty.

"The Flight Director may, after analysis of the flight, take any necessary action required for the successful completion of the mission," the mission rules stated.

Any error was unforgivable.

And in the 1960s and early 1970s–the years of Apollo–Gene Kranz thought there was no better job in the world.

*

Kranz became so obsessed with the engineering discipline of mission operations that in the months before Apollo 11 he filled a brown notebook 3 1/2 inches thick with personal notes on how to orchestrate every second of the flight.

 "You have to be intensely aware of . . . pulling this ballet together that involved everybody doing the right thing at the right time under a constantly changing set of circumstances," he said.

But any misgivings, confusion or uncertainty he kept under control and out of view.

"No way can you ever, ever, ever evidence confusion, concern, lack of understanding," he said. "You have to be in charge. You are the guy. You have to be cooler than cool, smarter than smart.

"I did everything by the numbers. I had checklists upon checklists. If I wasn't ahead of everybody on my team, I didn't feel I was doing my job.

"I was constantly testing myself: What am I going to do if. . . ?"

*

In the process, something of Gene Kranz became a permanent part of manned spaceflight.

At the Johnson Space Center in Houston, the Mission Control room Kranz and his colleagues used for Apollo has changed only slightly since 1969.

July 24, 1969, Cover Today, as NASA juggles space shuttle missions and prepares to operate a manned space station, its vocabulary and work habits mimic the obsessive attention to detail and studious nonchalance of flight operations engineers like Kranz and his Apollo colleagues.

During a recent technical rehearsal of an upcoming shuttle flight, loose-leaf binders and foam coffee cups littered the beige and gray flight consoles. The half-light from computer monitors provided much of the illumination.

The faces were young and, in the shadows, energized.

Sprawling at their consoles, the new generation of NASA engineers flirted with simulated disasters.

They were rehearsing landing emergencies with the crew of the upcoming shuttle mission.

They handled each crisis in cryptic murmurs, a language of nods, glances and engineering acronyms. The movements were exaggeratedly casual, the tension so internalized as to be invisible. The calmer things appeared, the worse they must be.

Milt Heflin, lead flight director for the shuttle mission expected to begin Wednesday, watched the exercise from an unused console, patched into the conversations by a frayed headset cable.

Heflin, selected as a flight director by Kranz 11 years ago, called the job "one of the last bastions of common sense." He has handled 19 shuttle flights, including the Hubble Space Telescope repair mission in December–hailed as the most complex space operation since the moon landings.

At the time of the Apollo 11 mission, Heflin was a junior NASA technician fresh out of college. Kranz was 36 and had, for the purposes of flight operations, become common sense personified.

*

With just 10 minutes remaining before Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were scheduled to swing back around from behind the moon and begin their descent to the lunar surface, Kranz did the one thing no flight director was allowed to do.

He went off the loop.

NASA was so concerned with capturing every aspect of the Apollo missions that all communications–every "loop"–in the control room were to be officially monitored and recorded. History wanted to listen.

But Kranz had set up a private circuit where he could talk to his flight controllers out of official earshot, and now he called them together for a confidential "pulse check."

Stephen G. Bales, then a 26-year-old, $7,000-a-year engineer from Iowa, manned the guidance console for the lunar descent. Twenty-five years later, he sat down at the same gray console and recalled Kranz's words as best he could:

"We are getting ready to do something no one else has ever done. You are trained. You are prepared. We will do well. No matter how it turns out, when we walk out of this room, I will walk out with you. . . ."

July 24, 1969, Apollo Baby

Kranz ordered the doors of Mission Control locked. "Battle short," he sang out curtly, ordering the circuit breakers locked down so no power failure could interfere with the landing operation.

Then, aboard the Eagle, as the lunar lander was named, Armstrong and Aldrin emerged from the radio silence caused by orbiting behind the moon. Alone aboard the orbiting command capsule, astronaut Michael Collins waited for them to start the descent.

Then the problems started.

Communications were unusually distorted and static-filled. Could they get enough data to allow the flight to continue?

Yes.

Go, Kranz ordered.

Then static drowned out all critical data for 30 seconds.

July 25, 1969, Cover When the signals picked up again, radar readings revealed the craft was moving too fast. If it continued to accelerate, it might overshoot the landing zone and Kranz would have to order an abort, Bales recalled.

Kranz stood at the flight director's console, his palms so damp they left perfect prints on his notebook when he leaned forward. Whispering in his ears were a dozen voices from six communications loops and the air-to-ground communications channel.

Then, on board the spacecraft, a power meter failed. No sooner had the ground team responded to that problem than a computer program alarm flashed in the capsule and on the meters in Mission Control. That signaled that the on-board computer was getting overloaded.

"I hear a very innocuous call from the crew: A program alarm," Kranz recalled. "About that time, Steve Bales echoes it. Then it echoes in the back room. Program alarm. Program alarm. Program alarm."

Would they have to abort?

Sitting at the guidance console he occupied when the alarm came through, Bales remembers his controlled panic. "I was still almost in overflow from the first problem. I could not remember what I was supposed to do for the life of me for a second." The alarm kept on.

"We're go on that alarm?" Kranz said, asking if he could let the landing proceed.

Bales hesitated. Voices on four or five loops dissected the problem in a knowledgeable gabble in his ear. Within seconds, he determined, the problem could be safely ignored.

Kranz grunted acknowledgment. The descent would continue.

The computer alarm went off again. "We're go," Bales told Kranz, more confidently. Again the alarm came. Again.

"Hang tight, everybody," Kranz said over the flight director's loop.

"Eagle, you're looking great. You're go," said capsule communicator Charles Duke, relaying Kranz's assent. Duke was the only one in Mission Control allowed to talk directly to the crew in flight.

Once given the go-ahead, Armstrong proceeded as planned and took manual control at 2,000 feet.

His flying skills were so formidable that three times–nursing a crippled jet onto the deck of the carrier Essex, at the controls of an X-15, and then in a Gemini space capsule–he turned near-disaster into triumph.

Aboard the lunar lander, he steered the craft back and forth, seeking a safe spot in the boulder-strewn landscape.

In Houston, a flight controller announced on the loop how much longer the lander could fly as descent fuel levels dropped.

Sixty seconds left.

Thirty seconds.

Fifteen.

Through the static, Aldrin reported seeing dust from the surface, blown up by the engine exhaust.

"OK, engine stop," Aldrin radioed.

When he realized the spacecraft had touched down, Kranz froze.

"Houston, Tranquillity Base here," Armstrong radioed. "The Eagle has landed."

It was 3:18 p.m. Houston time, July 20, 1969.

The muffled cheers and applause from the spectators rumbled through the double-paned glass observation windows into the control room.

Kranz couldn't talk or will himself to move. "The reality hit. It stopped being a simulation in that moment and started being a real event," Kranz said.

Elation was the one thing he had not rehearsed.

To break the spell, Kranz slammed his arm down on his console as hard as he could. The pain allowed him to breathe again.

"I want quiet in this room," he ordered. The mission clock was running.

July 26, 1969, Flat Earth

Two days later he was shaving and noticed his forearm was black and blue from wrist to elbow.

*

Armstrong resigned from NASA within 18 months of his return to Earth and withdrew into the privacy of a small farm outside Lebanon, Ohio, shunning publicity. There would be no autobiography, political campaigns or commercial endorsements.

Until 1979, Armstrong taught aerospace engineering at the University of Cincinnati, then confined his public activities to a few corporate boards and chairmanship of AIL Systems, a small high-technology engineering firm on Long Island.

Kranz gave the rest of his working life to Mission Control.

In 1970, when an on-board explosion threatened the lives of the Apollo 13 astronauts halfway to the moon, Kranz was at the flight director's console and helped save them.

In 1986, Kranz–still in the mission director's chair–had no way to avert disaster as an explosion destroyed the space shuttle Challenger.

And last winter, as space shuttle astronauts repaired the Hubble Space Telescope, Kranz oversaw the entire Mission Operations Directorate from the same chair.

He retired in March.

The third-floor control room, from which he orchestrated the moon landing, is on the National Register of Historic Places. NASA plans to make it a museum exhibit.

Kranz, reflecting on Armstrong's distaste for public attention or adulation, pronounced his own judgment on the Apollo 11 astronaut and, in doing so, unconsciously announced his own epitaph:

"He wanted to do something, rather than be something," Kranz said. "And he did it."

Posted in @news, broadcasting, Film, Front Pages, Richard Nixon, Science, Television, Transportation, UFOs | Comments Off on Apollo’s Unseen Titan

July 17, 1939: Nuestro Pueblo / Hollywood

July 17, 1939: A pen and ink drawing of the Lasky barn by Los Angeles Times artist Charles Owens
July 17, 1939: Nuestro Pueblo stops at the Lasky barn on the Paramount lot, where it’s being used as a gymnasium.

Posted in Architecture, art and artists, books, Film, Hollywood, Nuestro Pueblo | Comments Off on July 17, 1939: Nuestro Pueblo / Hollywood

Chinese Drama Troupe Performs in Los Angeles

July 17, 1899, Chinese Troupe

July 17, 1899: The educators convention underway in Los Angeles brings a troupe of 55 Chinese performers from San Francisco.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Chinese Drama Troupe Performs in Los Angeles

Jack the Ripper Strikes Again

July 17, 1889, Jack the Ripper

July 17, 1889: Another horrible murder by Jack the Ripper.

Posted in Homicide | Comments Off on Jack the Ripper Strikes Again

October 9, 1994: Julius Shulman Q & A

Los Angeles Times Interview

Julius Shulman

Capturing the Essence of California Architecture

October 9, 1994

By Steve Proffitt, Steve Proffitt is a producer for Fox News and a contributor to National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” and “Morning Edition.” He spoke with Julius Shulman at the photographer’s home in the Hollywood Hills

In 1960, Julius Shulman took a photograph that, perhaps more than any other single image, conveys the style, grace and allure of postwar Los Angeles. Inside a steel-topped glass box balanced lightly on a hilltop, two young women in white cotton chat, while the City of Angels sparkles below. It is a picture both nostalgic and modern, the work of a self-taught photographer who truly invented himself.

In 1936, Shulman used a vest-pocket Kodak to snap a shot of a Hollywood home designed by architect Richard Neutra. A brash 26-year-old, he showed the picture to Neutra, and a career was born. Neutra hired him to photograph some of his other projects, and introduced the young photographer to such other leading West Coast architects as R.M. Schindler, Raphael Soriano and Gregory Ain. Shulman’s dramatic prints played an important role in establishing an international reputation for these and other Southern California architects, especially during the ’50s, a period many consider the golden age of Modernism. More than any architect of that era, he created a public image of the California style of design.

Perhaps because he never had formal training, Shulman worked intuitively, eschewing light meters and fancy light-reflecting umbrellas, and relying on nature. Yet, he was a master manipulator, often working at twilight, creating long exposures, opening and closing the lens, while turning lights on and off, to create texture and contrast. His clients often expressed surprise when seeing his images, for Shulman created a vision even they, as the creating architects, had never seen.

Shulman, who turns 84 tomorrow, lives with his wife, Olga, in a steel-frame house designed, in 1949, for them by Soriano. Long walls of glass contrast with corrugated sheet-steel siding. The house is hidden within two heavily wooded acres in the Hollywood Hills.

In 1986, Shulman announced his retirement, in part as a way of expressing his distaste for post-modernist design. But the lure of the lens was too strong, and now, back at work, he’s busier than ever. A retrospective of his early photographs is currently on view at the Craig Krull gallery in Santa Monica, and a biography, “A Constructed View: The Architectural Photographs of Julius Shulman,” by Joseph Rosa, has been published by Rizzoli. Inside his studio-office, Shulman shows off prints and publications, bouncing around the room with the energy of a teen-ager, promising not to retire until he hits 120.

*

Question: What were the elements that came together to make the 1950s so robust in terms of architecture in the Los Angeles area?

Answer: I’d say, first, the economy. The ’50s were glorious years . . . . The population was booming–people were coming to Los Angeles from all over the world. And architects were given free rein. They were allowed to experiment, not in the way that is being done today–these horrible monstrosities being made in the name of post-modernism–but with integrity. The architects of this period, people like Richard Neutra, Pierre Koenig, Gregory Ain–they respected the client. Every line they drew was drawn with the client in mind.

Those were the great years and the result was that, throughout the world, there was a recognition of these architects’ work. I was lucky to be doing the right thing at the right place at the right time. So anytime, anybody wanted a photograph of a modern house, Uncle Julius provided the picture.

Q: Can you describe the essence of the design philosophy of these ’50s Californian architects?

A: I have to backtrack a little to answer that. In the 1930s, it was the heyday of what we call the International style. Architects like Richard Neutra, Raphael Soriano–these men were following a very austere, Bauhaus kind of practice. The result was that many architects who followed people like Neutra began to edit that style of architecture, by doing things like literally raising the roof. They said, “We don’t have to have just a box, let’s add a little character to the design.”

And that was one of the things that happened during the ’50s, and right up to the ’60s. Soriano, for example, who did my house, used an all-steel framework. During the earthquake–it was a shattering, powerful quake–we had not a crack. I am indebted to Soriano for his discipline in using those steel frames. The earthquake has proven this type of architecture is completely successful.

Yet, Soriano didn’t have a client for 25 years. The public didn’t recognize his work; they didn’t buy it. But other architects modified the austerity, began to create more space with higher ceilings, sloping roof lines, and created some character.

Q: So would you say that, in the 1950s, California architects held on to the framework of the Bauhaus, and humanized it?

A: Yes. The dominant feature of contemporary architecture in the ’50s was glass. My house has two window walls, which are 30 feet long. That’s great for us, because we are on a large piece of property, surrounded by a jungle. But, as my wife has always said, put this house on a 50-foot lot on a city street, and it would be a disaster.

Soriano once built a house in Long Beach on a normal, city-street lot. The bathroom faced the street, and he walled it with obscure glass–textured glass. He told the owner she didn’t need draperies because of the obscure glass.

She moved in, had a open house to meet her neighbors, and one of them said to her, “I hope we can be friendly and tell you this. We admire your figure when you take a shower.” The obscure glass provided a perfect view of her silhouette. The next day she got draperies.

So the architects who came down the line refined the architecture. They designed with less glass, more solid walls, more space. And the result was an architecture that became popular throughout the world. You could almost say it was an evolution in design, to fit the needs of more and more people.

Q: What happened in the ’60s and ’70s? Why did modernism in architecture fall into disfavor and disuse?

A: One of the reasons was that the public-at-large still didn’t buy the work of contemporary architects. And by the ’70s, a new breed of architect came on the scene–represented by men like Frank Gehry and Michael Graves and even Charles Moore–who introduced a sloping, high-cathedral-ceiling kind of design. People began to say, “Hey, this is good,” because these designs didn’t have the walls of glass like the ’40s and ’50s designs did. The result was that they began to accept what I call “weird architecture.”

And, right now, we are in still another transition. Even architects like Gehry are beginning to reform their designs. He admits that he is an experimenter, and his work is often not well-received by the public. Nowadays, the elite–the people who can afford it–they want something “different.” They are getting it. And they are paying for it.

Q: Let’s turn back to your career, and the way you use the camera. You’ve said the camera is not important when it comes to taking a picture. What do you mean?

A: The camera is the least important element in our work. Photography is dependent on the eye, the mind, the heart and the soul of the photographer. Many
times, even architects aren’t aware of the presence of their structures, and they will ask, “How did you get this picture?”

In 1937, the architect Stile Clements, one of the old-timers, had done the Coulters Department Store on Wilshire (razed in 1980). The building faced north. He called me–it was late in June–and asked me to photograph it. But he said there was a problem: Because it faced north, he thought I wouldn’t get any sunlight on the face of the building. I didn’t say anything other than that I could photograph it.

Well, being a good Boy Scout, I knew that the sun rises in the summertime in the northeast and sets in the northwest. Architects often don’t know these things. And so I went down early one Sunday morning–I do most of my public buildings on Sunday when there is less traffic, especially in those days. I set up my camera across the street, the sun was beaming across the north face of the building, and I made an 8×10 photograph. I gave it to Clements the next week and he said, “How did you do this, I thought the sun didn’t hit the north side of the building?” And I said, “Oh, it was easy Mr. Clements, I just turned the building to face the sun.”

The point is that I have always tried to be conscious of the site, the direction of the sun–by the minute. I learned to look at a building and know exactly what time of day to photograph, to best reflect and define the quality of the architecture. It has nothing to do with snapping a shutter. My photography is based on the quality of my vision, my feeling for nature, the site and location of a building and what was around the building.

Q: You almost always include people in your photographs, something fairly unique to you in architectural photography. Why people in a picture of a building?

A: For scale, and also to create a feeling of occupancy. When I photograph, for instance, a university building, I will round up some young people and put them in places where they fill in voids in the space. Without the people, you would get a flat, vacant, austere photograph. Sometimes, I will tell people, “OK, that’s it, we’re all through”–and just as they start to move and walk away, that’s when I actually take the picture.

Q: Your photograph of the Pierre Koenig house is, to me, an almost perfect expression of the optimism of the 1950s–the house cantilevered over the city below, and the two women so breezy and sleek and sophisticated. Did you know how dramatic this photograph would be when you took it then?

A: Well, people just love to see that picture. It represents a quality of architecture and photography that is not very well-observed. But the ironic thing is that when I took the exposure in my 4×5 camera, I honestly didn’t know what I had. I saw something–a mood and a scene. But I didn’t realize I had made what would literally be one of my masterpieces.

Q: It seems silly to ask, but who are those two women?

A: Pierre Koenig, the architect, told me he wanted to bring some of his students when I photographed the house, and I told him to have them bring their girlfriends; I’ll use them as models. I never imagined this picture, though–we were doing photographs of the interior of the house. Then I happened to step outside, and I saw the view, and the girls in the house, chatting. I thought, “Wow, this might make a fine picture!” So I set my camera up outside, turned the lights off in the house, and exposed the film for about seven minutes, to capture the lights of the city below. Then we set off a flash inside the house to get the girls on film, and that was it.

Q: So it’s a composite–an image the human eye itself could never experience in reality?

A: Exactly. And can you believe that until I read the title of the new book about me by Joseph Rosa–“A Constructed View”–did I understand that is exactly what I was doing for these 59 years: I construct my view of a building. My wife has always said that I capture a moment which can never be reproduced. No photographer could go back to that Koenig house and reconstruct that photograph–no matter how hard he tried. It was a secret, wonderful moment in my life. It almost makes you feel religious–thank God, I’m an atheist!

You know, I’ve never used an exposure meter. I often use natural, reflected light. I rely on nature, and the picture comes out because I know the value and quality of the film I’m using. I feel blessed that I’ve been ordained, if you will, to do this kind of photography and not only make a success out of it, but to create a success for the architects as well.*

Posted in 1960, Architecture, art and artists, books, Photography | Comments Off on October 9, 1994: Julius Shulman Q & A

Found on EBay — Oviatt’s

Oviatt's Jacket

A men's jacket from Oviatt's Beverly Hills store has been listed on EBay. Bidding starts at $5.99.
Posted in Fashion | Comments Off on Found on EBay — Oviatt’s

Matt Weinstock, July 16, 1959

Tomato in a Hamburger?

Matt Weinstock Again,
the other day, I became embroiled in an old argument. I stood firmly on
my contention that the slice of tomato does not belong in a hamburger
sandwich. Most of the other people at the barbecue held that it does.

Mustard,
relish, lettuce and, if one is feeling brave, onions — yes. Tomato,
no. Furthermore, I'm not so sure about the dill pickle. Let's just let
it lay on the plate, to be eaten or not to be eaten. A pickle is a
matter of mood.

Tomato, I argued, is a nothing flavor, which
diffuses and distorts an already perfect hunk of eating. Not only that,
it adds to the sandwich's thickness, making it difficult to eat.

The opposition scoffed, repeating the ridiculous canard that a hamburger is not a hamburger without a slice of tomato.

July 16, 1959, Liz Renay All
right, so I am exposed as a tomato hater. All I can state is that it's
about time those of us who feel deeply on this subject start a revolt
against this vicious tyranny.

::

WORD STUFF — An announcer on a Lancaster radio station, Jimmie Warrell reports, told of two bicycle riders traveling from "Holiet, Illinois, to La Hoya, California." Those Spanish Js will getcha . . . There's an Ingomar St. in Canoga Park and Stan Wood, an admirer of Ingemar Johansson, says whoever named it may have been psychic but wasn't a very good speller . . . And Herb Schnebble wonders if Al Capone ever passed through El Cajon.

::

DOWN THE MIDDLE
Vacation pleasures
I'd willingly share;
"Wish you were here!"
And I were there.
       — RALPH FREEMAN

::

IN 1950 Paul Werth paid Harry Belafonte $50 for appearing in concert in Town Hall, New York. A few days ago Werth, now with KRHM-FM,
taped a four-hour show with the noted singer for next Monday night and
jokingly suggested that he would be glad to arrange another such
concert and maybe up the ante to $75. Offer laughingly declined.

::

A SOCIOLOGY student at SC made a telephone survey after 9 p.m. to learn how many parents knew of their children's whereabouts.

Of
25 calls, he was surprised to discover, the phone was answered nine
times by children who didn't know where their parents were.

::

A MUNICIPAL
employees cafeteria, which actually serves excellent food, is known
among them as the Ulcer Room. Perverse, those fellows . . . And a Hill
St. gentleman drinker named Chuck, explaining a brief absence from the
bat caves, said he'd been attending "a bourbon seance."

::

july 16, 1959, Miss Cuba AROUND TOWN — Baseball fever note: On coming out of the anesthetic after giving birth to their first child, Martha Dubell, wife of pianist Cy Dubell, asked her doctor, "How did the Dodgers make out?" They lost but she's doing fine . . . Six Bonita High Schoolers
are grateful to Bill Bendix, who put out in his speedboat in Lido Isle
channel and towed their stalled sailboat to safety. And not a press
agent in sight.

::

FOOTNOTES —
Ray Duncan nominates for the trite movie dialogue file the line,
"Forgive? There's nothing to forgive!" The heck there isn't . . . When
the temperature soared over the weekend, adman Joe Vodneck , Pasadena
apartment dweller, took his wife, Adrienne, and daughter, Lisa, to a
nearby motel where they enjoyed the pool and air conditioning. Next morning back to Hotsville
. . . Because of conflicting warnings which have gone out lately over
the wireless Hank Osborne thinks the world is ready for an album titled
"Best of the SigAlerts " . . . Aside to a lady named Julia: Those gals
on Hollywood Freeway islands and shoulders were only part-time
picnickers. Between bites of lunch they were taking the annual state
highway traffic count.

Posted in Columnists, Matt Weinstock, Mickey Cohen | Comments Off on Matt Weinstock, July 16, 1959

Paul V. Coates — Confidential File, July 16, 1959

july 16, 1959, Cover

Confidential File

Some Judges Deal in Real Justice

Paul CoatesTwo weeks ago I quoted you a rather amazing conversation between an attorney and Los Angeles Municipal Judge George B. Ross.

At least, to me it was amazing.

The gist of the judge's remarks to the attorney, who was questioning the severity of the sentence given his client, was:

If
a man pleads not guilty and asks for a jury trial, and he's found
guilty, and I believe he was obviously guilty, it's going to cost him a
lot more than if he pleaded guilty in the first place.

The
attorney, Louis Romero, argued that trial by jury was the right of
everyone, rich or poor. It was not a privilege reserved only for the
wealthy.

He added that levying heavier fines against individuals who used their right of jury trial was a deterrent to justice.

Judge
Ross replied, "Maybe so, but that is what I am doing. That is what
other judges are doing, and you are going to have a to persuade a lot
of judges to change their minds…"

July 16, 1959, Trunk Killer At the time, I questioned Judge Ross' statement that it is a common practice of our courts to soak someone for exercising a constitutional right.

And last week, Mirror News reporter Paul Weeks polled several judges, who both denied and criticized the use of such a policy.

I thought, then, that possibly Judge Ross' attitude was a unique one.

But
today I received a copy of "The Open Forum," official publication of
the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

In it was the following article:

 "A
Long Beach judge who habitually set excessive bail when a defendant
insisted on a jury trial was officially condemned in a ruling handed
down by Superior Judge Frank G. Swain last month.

"The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the appeal of Emery Newbern, merchant seaman, and ordered his bail reduced from $500 to the customary $25.

"Judge Swain appointed ACLU counsel A.L. Wirin to represent Newbern in the appeal of Municipal Judge Charles T. Smith's bail policy.

"Wirin argued that the Long Beach jurist had denied Newbern's constitutional rights to reasonable bail solely because the defendant has exercised another constitutional right, trial by jury.

Bail Held Excessive

"Judge Swain held that $500 bail on a drunk charge is 'excessive' and penalizes the petitioner for demanding his constitutional rights.

"
'It is undisputed that the purpose of bail is to assure defendant's
presence in court at the required time and bail set at a figure higher
than an amount reasonably calculated to fulfill this purpose is
excessive under the Eighth Amendment of the U.S.Constitution,' Judge Swain ruled.

"At Newbern's
arraignment, Judge Smith remarked from the bench, 'My policy is that if
you plead not guilty and demand trial by jury and are found guilty, you
are going to get 90 days in jail; and I will bet you 100 to 1 that the
jury finds you guilty.' "

Judge Smith's quoted remark is about
as shocking a statement as I've ever heard attributed to a man paid by
the taxpayers of our country to administer justice.

If it
weren't for the cynicism which accompanies my advancing age, I'd say
that a judge's betting a defendant that a jury will find him guilty is
an inconceivable bit of dialogue. It sounds like something out of a burlesque routine or out of a Moscow courtroom.

However, such bizarre interpretations of justice in our courtrooms are more the exception than the rule.

It's
reassuring to know that there are dedicated men like Judge Swain who
don't feel that the robe is so sacred that its wearers aren't subject
to public criticism when the occasion warrants.

And if Judge Smith made the remarkable statement attributed to him, the occasion certainly warrants.

Posted in Columnists, Paul Coates | Comments Off on Paul V. Coates — Confidential File, July 16, 1959

A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept: Your Movie Stars

 
July 16, 1939, Movies

July 16, 1939: The comedians vs. the leading men in a benefit game at Wrigley Field.  

Posted in Film, Hollywood, Sports | Comments Off on A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept: Your Movie Stars

Nuestro Pueblo

July 16, 1939, Seewerker Nuestro Pueblo

On July 15, 1939, Jane Seewerker, wife of Times writer Joe Seewrker, died in Long Beach. Joe Seewerker and Charles Owens had been producing three features a week, but after Jane Seewerker's death, their schedule went to once a week.
Posted in art and artists, books, Nuestro Pueblo, Obituaries | 1 Comment

Police Court

 
July 16, 1899, Police Court

July
16, 1899: Malicious mischief … selling lottery tickets … speeding … theft and robbery. And yes, The Times refers to a "slant-eyed disciple of Confucius."

Posted in #courts, LAPD | Comments Off on Police Court

Man Dies of Tetanus

July 16, 1889, Tetanus

July 16, 1889: A man dies of tetanus and railroad employees are suspected of raping two passengers.

Posted in health, Transportation | Comments Off on Man Dies of Tetanus

Found on EBay — The Courthouse

Broadway Courthouse A postcard showing an unusual view of Broadway, with the courthouse in the foreground at left and City Hall in the background, has been listed on EBay. Bidding starts at $7.99.
Posted in #courts, Architecture, Downtown | Comments Off on Found on EBay — The Courthouse

Matt Weinstock, July 15, 1959

 

July 15, 1959, Uras

I'm sure "Uras" wasn't pronounced the way you think. Either that or the comics editors didn't have a clue. 

Only in L.A.

Matt Weinstock Sometimes it is
very difficult to make clear to visitors that the natives are not
really as quaint as they seem. Take, for instance, Bob Williams, TV
editor of the Philadelphia Bulletin, vacationing here.

To get
around our spread-out paradise, Bob rented a car. He parked it the
other night at the curb outside the hotel in Beverly Hills where he was
staying.

Next day at 7 a.m. his doorbell rang. A stranger,
polite but with a sense of urgency, asked if Bob would consent to
having his car moved two spaces away. Just give him the keys. He would
do it. Bob asked why. "We need the space for another car," was the
reply.

"IT IS IMPERATIVE," he went on, "that my
employer's car be parked where your car is — in front of the walk
leading from his bungalow. I know it's an inconvenience and I wish you'd take this." He offered a $20 bill, which Bob declined.

Bob,
irked at being awakened by such a trivial matter, wanted to know how
the stranger had located him. His rented car didn't have his name on
it. The stranger said he'd found him through the rental agency, which
was the same one from which his employer had rented his car.

The more Bob thought of it the more it bugged him. He called the hotel manager. The manager refused to discuss it. He called the rental car agency and asked who the other person was, describing the car.

July 15, 1959, Judy Garland

"I
can't give you the name," was the discreet reply. However, he confided
the name of the big aircraft firm to which the car had been assigned.

Baffled Bob will always have a dark suspicion that people here are driven by mad, uncontrollable whimsies. One thing sure — it couldn't have happened in sedate Philadelphia.

::

BREAKDOWN of negotiations and the resultant steel strike reminded newsmen of a classic line in another similar dispute.

A union spokesman said to the management representative, "But you're talking money and we're talking people!" Whereupon everyone cried.

::

July 15, 1959, Garland THE stenographic pool at a large organization has been enhanced by some shapely young girls just out of school and an executive, who likes to keep abreast of developments, dropped in the other day and said to the supervisor, "I see you have some new talent."

"Yes," she replied sweetly, "but all passes have to go through channels."

::

AND THE WAY
Don Perkins heard it, two fellows were chatting over coffee and one
said, "I had a funny dream last night. I dreamed I was 8 years old and
went to Disneyland."

"That's strange," the other said, "I had a
crazy dream, too. I dreamed that Marilyn Monroe came over to my house
and 15 minutes later Jayne Mansfield dropped in."

"You mean they were both there?" the first exclaimed. "Why didn't you call me?"

"I did," was the reply, "and your mother told me you had gone to Disneyland."

::

July 15, 1959, Abby SOMEONE, Bob McMullen
reports, has posted a derisive sign at Laurel Canyon Blvd. and Lookout
Mountain Ave., "Guide Maps to Burned Out Homes" . . . And colleagues
are talking of awarding a plaque for devotion to duty to a TV announcer
who during the chaotic first moments of last Friday's fire kept
pleading for people to keep out of the area. "Please stay home," he
said, "and enjoy the fire on TV."

::

AT RANDOM — On
Sunday Julia Nye counted six family groups enjoying picnic lunches on
Hollywood Freeway islands and sidings — the grassy parts. Apparently
tourists think it's a park . . . A man whose little flower shop is near
a saloon, into which he makes frequent pilgrimages, is known among his
customers as the Petrified Florist. . . Obviously, says Harry Kabakoff, newsboy at 7th and Broadway, the Russian people feel that Mr. K. has an O in front of his name. . . Bruce Baptiste asks a typographical
posy to the officer who on July 9 in the noon heat — above 90 —
stopped and changed a tire for a lady in distress on Harbor Freeway
near Vermont Ave.

Posted in Columnists, Matt Weinstock | 1 Comment

Paul V. Coates — Confidential File, July 15, 1959

July 15, 1959, Evil Woman

Confidential File

Harry Karl's Barber Is Pro Tem Leftist

Paul CoatesWhen
he's not busy totaling the day's receipts, Harry Karl, the shoe tycoon,
is a member in good standing of a social class known as the idle rich.

He is, so to speak, loaded.

Unlike you or me, he doesn't wait until the "January white" sales are announced to replenish his home linen supply.

If
his neighborhood supermarket is featuring ground round as a week-end
special, he's the kind of guy who'll shrug it off and plop a seven-bone
roast into his push-cart.

You get the idea? Money, with Harry, is no object.

Take haircuts. I know, and you know, that at $1.75 a head, barbers are getting away with daring daylight robbery.

But that's not Harry's feelings. For a perfect trim and the proper swivel-chair treatment, he'll go as high as $1,000.

You don't believe me? Well, sit down and hear me out.

July 15, 1959, Race Mixing Recently,
Karl was sitting in Maury's chair at the Beverly-Wilshire Health Club,
pondering a problem of relatively immense proportions, considering the
moment.

He was about to leave on an extended vacation to Hawaii.
While there, he would need a haircut. And Maury, his barber for 22
years, wouldn't be available, obviously, to perform the ritual.

"The only answer," Karl sighed finally, "is for you to fly over after me."

Maury, a man quick to oblige the whims of his customers, agreed to make the trip.

On
schedule, Maury arrived in Honolulu. Karl's chauffeur met him at the
airport and drove him to the hotel. Although it was still before 7
a.m., the barber went directly to his customer's hotel suite.

He
banged on the door until Karl woke up and opened it. The shoe magnate
muttered a sleepy greeting, yawned luxuriously and rubbed his eyes
until he could see reasonably well. What he saw made him turn pale. The
barber's right arm was neatly encased in a plaster cast.

"Maury!" he cried, pointing at it in horror. "What's that?"

"My arm," the barber replied. "I broke it three days ago."

"You
can't do that to me," Karl screamed. "Look at my hair. Three weeks I've
been waiting for you to come over here and cut it. And whatta you do? You break your arm."

"I didn't do it on purpose," Maury pleaded.

July 15, 1959, Mirror Cover "A
thousand bucks it cost me to get you over here," Karl raged, pacing up
and down. "Why didn't you call and tell me you broke your arm? Why did
you come all the way over here?"

Maury shrugged. "You got me the ticket, I figured I might as well use it. I never been to Honolulu before."

Karl
collapsed into a chair and buried his uncut head in his hands. Maury
patted him on the back with his good arm. "Look," he said soothingly,
"we'll go to the hotel barber and I'll give him directions how to cut."

"Directions!" Karl shouted. "You could've done that on the telephone. A thousand dollars you cost me. You're a rat, Maury. You hear me? A rat."

Karl
continued pacing and furiously banging a fist into his hand. Finally,
with an exasperated sigh, he said: "As long as you're here, you might
as well stay for a day."

"No hard feelings?" the barber asked meekly.

"My luck," Karl muttered bitterly. "I got to wind up with a one-arm barber."

Guy Needs Some Killing

"No hard feelings?" Maury repeated. "Let's shake on it."

With
a flourish, he thrust out the "broken" arm. "See? It isn't broken," he
said brightly. "It was just a gag I thought up before I left."

I'd
like to end this story by telling you that Karl took the barber's arm
and broke it. But he didn't. If he had, it would mean flying in Maury's
partner from the mainland.

And, after all, who ever heard of paying $2,000 for one haircut.

Posted in Columnists, Paul Coates | Comments Off on Paul V. Coates — Confidential File, July 15, 1959

Young Florita Tears Up the Town

Jan. 31, 1899, Divorce Court

Jan. 31, 1899: Many people, especially the noir fans, prefer the newspapers of the 1930s and '40s, but I love the turn of the century papers because The Times wrote about everything that happened and didn't spare the details.

Posted in #courts, Food and Drink | Comments Off on Young Florita Tears Up the Town

A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept: Your Movies

July 15, 1938, Movies

July 15, 1938: Norma Shearer and Tyrone Power in "Marie Antoinette" at the Carthay Circle.

Posted in Film, Hollywood | Comments Off on A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept: Your Movies

Police Court

July 15, 1899, Police Court

July
15, 1899: An old panhandler … a man arrested for speeding … theft … prostitution and public intoxication. Yes, The Times referred to an Asian as a "slant-eyed celestial."

Posted in #courts, LAPD | Comments Off on Police Court

Killing in Chinatown

July 15, 1889, Siegel the Hatter  

July
15,
1889: Siegel the Hatter, under the Nadeau Hotel.

July 15, 1889, Killing


July 15, 1889: A killing in Chinatown. The old newspapers never spared the gruesome details.

Posted in #courts, Downtown, Homicide | Comments Off on Killing in Chinatown

Found on EBay — Polytechnic High School

Polytechnic High, Library  

A lot of 12 postcards, including Polytechnic High School, top left, and the library, bottom left, has been listed on EBay. Other postcards include Angels Flight, Bullock's downtown, the fountain at what is now Pershing Square, the alligator farm and the Plaza Church.  Bidding starts at $9.99.
Posted in Animals, Architecture, Downtown, Education, Parks and Recreation | Comments Off on Found on EBay — Polytechnic High School