Paul V. Coates – Confidential File, Feb. 12, 1960

Feb. 12, 1960, Mirror Cover 

If Jack Paar is remembered at all, it’s for walking off the “Tonight” show (yes, he returned). From watching him as a kid, I remember him as being urbane but volatile – a curious combination.

Feb. 11, 1960, Hex

Minnie, 83, and Young Neighbor, 75, Feuding

Paul Coates    (News item)  DETROIT, Feb. 11- When 83-year-old Mrs. Minnie Gilland decided her "young" 75-year-old neighbor, Mrs. Mary Donaldson, was trying to "witch" away her husband, she knew exactly what to do.  She painted a "hex" sign- of tar and chicken feathers- on Mrs. Donaldson's house. A local judge knew what to do, too.  He found her guilty of destroying property.

    While the rest of you were idly standing in line for tickets to the Finch trial yesterday, I was busy getting the facts on another reported love triangle.

    To wit, that rumored affaire d'amour between Mary Donaldson and Minnie Gilland's husband.

    And I can tell you now, there isn't a thing to it.

    I telephoned Mrs. Donaldson in Detroit last night.

    "This is The Mirror News in Hollywood calling," I explained.  (Whenever I phone anybody long-distance I always tell them I'm calling from Hollywood.  Everybody's heard of Hollywood.  But how many out-of-towners have heard of Los Angeles?)

    "From Hollywood?" she gasped.  "What do you want with me?"

Feb. 12, 1960, Jack Paar     I explained that Minnie Gilland's accusations against her had been printed here, and the interests of honest journalism would be served if she would tell me her side of the story.

    "Oh," she commented.  Then she added:  "Frankly, I don't need any more publicity about it.  I wouldn't have that woman's husband."

    "Then," I probed gently, "it was all just nasty neighborhood gossip?"

    "Gossip?"  Mrs. Donaldson cried.  "Who was gossiping?  It was just that woman.  She was the only one who was saying things.

    "The neighbors," she added.  "They're all on my side."

    "You never did anything to arouse her suspicions?"  I asked.

    Mrs. Donaldson cleared her throat.  "Sir, I'm an honorable woman.  The only association I have with that woman's husband is I buy my coal from him.  He's a coal-man.  But all he does is pour it into the bin.  From outside the house, I do my own shoveling.

    "Of course," she added after a pause, "I've given him a meal a few times.  But everybody in the neighborhood does.  That woman won't even cook for her husband.  He'd starve if we didn't feed him."

Feb. 12, 1960, Finch Trial     "Do you think," I asked, "that Mrs. Gilland might have misinterpreted these little acts of neighborliness and put the hex on you? . . ."

    "Put the hex on me?"  Mrs. Donaldson interrupted.  "She didn't put any hex on me.  She claims that I put one on her to get her husband away from her.  She told the judge that was why she put that big circle of tar and feathers on my house.  To get rid of the hex that I put on HER.
   
    "Me!" she said.  "I don't even believe in hexes."

    There was, but only for a moment, silence.  Then Mrs. Donaldson continued:

    "And another thing.  That woman told the papers that she was 83 years old.  More like 85 and 90, if you ask me.  Married to a man in his 60s.  Imagine that!  She says he's her second husband, but I say he's her third."

Indelicate Question

    "The papers," I inserted gingerly, "quoted your age as 75.  Is that right?"

    "Well, I don't show my age.  At least, that's what everyone says."

    "May I ask you an indelicate question, Mrs. Donaldson?"

    "You may try,"   she said.

    "Do you," I said, "have any romantic interests at present?"

    "Sir,"  she said, "I'm 75 years old.  I'm a widow.  When you're my age, you don't think of things like that.  That's why I can't understand what's gotten into that woman."

    By this time, I had the situation pretty well sized up.  I thanked Mrs. Donaldson.  I hung up satisfied that I had protected the sanctity of one American home.

    And now that that's out of the way, I've got this guy saving my place in line at the Finch trial and I'm open to any reasonable offers.  Do I hear $5?   
   

Posted in #courts, broadcasting, Columnists, Front Pages, Homicide, Paul Coates, Television | 1 Comment

Jim Murray – Requiem for a Buddy

Feb. 12, 1980, Jim Murray
Feb. 12, 1980, Jim Murray 

Feb. 12, 1980: A Jim Murray turn of phrase, “When you talk about love affairs, you start with theirs. They made Romeo and Juliet look like enemies.”

Posted in Columnists, Sports | 1 Comment

A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept.: Your Movie Columnist

Feb. 12, 1950, Hedda Hopper

Feb. 12, 1950, Hedda Hopper

Feb. 12, 1950: William Holden tells Hedda Hopper, "It's up to the producers. You know stars are made by them before they're made by the public. And stars are broken by producers before they're broken by the public. Thus it's a common thing for the public to be asking for stars about whom the producers have entirely forgotten."

Posted in Columnists, Film, Hollywood | Comments Off on A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept.: Your Movie Columnist

Movie Star Mystery Photo


      Feb. 8, 2010, Mystery Photo
Los Angeles Times file photo

 
Update: Virtually everyone recognized our mystery guest as Louise Beavers.

Oct. 27, 1962, Louise Beavers

Oct. 27, 1962: Louise Beavers dies at the age of 60.

Nov. 2, 1962, Louise Beavers

 
Nov. 2, 1962: Services for Louise Beavers include her favorite gospel song, “City Called Heaven,” and her favorite Scripture, Psalm 91. 

Nov. 26, 1974, Louise Beavers
After her death, Beavers was the subject of several articles in The Times examining the portrayal of African Americans in movies, including this Nov. 26, 1974, piece by J.K. Obatala. In 1976, Beavers was posthumously inducted into the Black Film-Makers Hall of Fame in Oakland.

Just a reminder on how this works: I post the mystery photo on Monday and reveal the answer on Friday … or on Saturday if I have a hard time picking only five pictures; sometimes it's difficult to choose. To keep the mystery photo from getting lost in the other entries, I move it from Monday to Tuesday to Wednesday, etc., adding a photo every day.

I have to approve all comments, so if your guess is posted immediately, that means you're wrong. (And if a wrong guess has already been submitted by someone else, there's no point in submitting it again).

If you're right, you will have to wait until Friday. There's no need to submit your guess five times. Once is enough. The only reward is bragging rights. 

The answer to last week's mystery star: Blossom Seeley and Benny Fields.

Feb. 9, 2010, Mystery Photo  Los Angeles Times file photo

Update: The caption information on the back of the photo, stamped Oct. 15, 1950, says, “Unimpressed by the celebrated glamour of his opponent, many Hollywood celebrities are working energetically to elect Rep. Richard Nixon to the United States Senate. Here are a trio who have teamed up to work in the Nixon-for-Senator campaign: Irene Dunne, Louise Beavers and Hedda Hopper.”

Wow! Nearly everybody identified our mystery guest, too many folks to list everybody’s name. Here’s another picture of our mystery guest with two (not very) mysterious companions. Aren't the hats great?

Feb. 10, 2010, Mystery Photo

Los Angeles Times file photo

Update: Louise Beavers and Postmaster Mary D. Briggs in an undated photo.

Daily Mirror readers are certainly sharp! Everybody recognized yesterday’s (not very) mysterious companions. Today’s mystery companion may be a little more difficult. 

Feb. 11, 2010, Mystery Photo

Los Angeles Times file photo

Update: Louise Beavers, Ann Sheridan and an unidentified actor (suggestions include Clinton Sundberg and Dick Ross) in “Good Sam,” Sept. 15, 1948.

And here’s our mystery guest with two more mysterious companions.  So far nobody has identified yesterday’s mystery companion – but she’s tough.

Feb. 12, 2010, Mystery Photo

Los Angeles Times file photo

Update: Louise Beavers in “Beulah,” with Jane Frazee, left, David Bruce, center, and Stuffy Singer.

 
Posted in Film, Hollywood, Mystery Photo, Photography | 76 Comments

Confronted With Recording, Finch Says He Wouldn’t Lie

Carole Tregoff, July 22, 1959
Photograph by John Malmin / Los Angeles Times

July 22, 1959: Carole Tregoff enters a detectives' office for more questioning in the death of Barbara Jean Finch.

Feb. 12, 1960, Finch Trial

Feb. 12, 1960, Finch Trial

Feb. 12, 1960, Finch Trial

Feb. 12, 1960, Finch Trial

Feb. 12, 1960, Cocoanut Grove

Hey, it’s Lena Horne at the Cocoanut Grove. Wouldn’t it be great to visit the Ambassador Hotel? Oh wait, we let L.A. Unified tear it down.

image

And then there’s the mystery of the guns found in a trash barrel outside Rondelli’s after the killing of Jack “the Enforcer” Whalen.

Feb. 12, 1960, Chavez Ravine

Feb. 12, 1960: The Times’ Frank Finch reports that Dodger Stadium will be symmetrical … and Bill Veeck predicts major league ball in Tokyo, Caracas, Honolulu and Mexico City.

Posted in #courts, Dodgers, Front Pages, Homicide, Sports | Comments Off on Confronted With Recording, Finch Says He Wouldn’t Lie

Former Minister Accused of Abuse

Feb. 12, 1920, Briggs “Wonder What a Twenty-Two Months-Old Baby Thinks About?” by Clare Briggs.

 Feb. 12, 1920, Minister 

 

Feb. 12, 1920: Walter H. Evans, a former Episcopal minister, is accused of extreme cruelty by his wife, who said she even wrote his sermons for him because he was so lazy. 

Posted in #courts, Comics, Religion | Comments Off on Former Minister Accused of Abuse

A Humiliating Night in Jail

Feb. 12, 1910, Jail 
 
Feb. 12, 1910: John L. Grant and his wife, Margie, are in jail on charges of obtaining money under false pretenses, accused of selling their five-year lease and the furniture in a rooming house at 1401 N. Winfield St. when their rent agreement prohibited transferring the lease.  Margie Grant may have been a delicate soul (she fainted at the sight of handcuffs) but she described an unpleasant night at the city jail.

Posted in #courts, LAPD | Comments Off on A Humiliating Night in Jail

Matt Weinstock, Feb. 11, 1960

 
Feb. 11, 1960, Peanuts
image

A Visit From Ptex

Matt Weinstock     After an absence of several years, Tex, or as he prefers to spell it, Ptex, dropped in the other day to say hello.  He brought with him, as he usually does, a great idea.

    "They're always giving these big banquets for political and civic leaders," he said, "how about a testimonial dinner for me?  I think I deserve one.  I'm the only real complete failure in the world."

    Ptex, a huge, jovial gentleman with a gray goatee, didn't come by this distinction without considerable strain.  He has been everywhere, done everything.  He has worked on newspapers, taught school, promoted weird schemes, advised men in high places, helped plot revolutions and, he admits frankly, washed dishes professionally and recently.

    Now at last, he said, he wants to do something big.  With the money he would get from the testimonial dinner, say $3,000 or $4,000, he would charter a "cotton picking yacht" at Balboa and run a cruise for 30 or 40 interested persons through the Panama Canal to Yucatan.  He figures $1,000 each would be about right.  And he has his mate's papers, you know.

image     "YUCATAN,"
he sighed dreamily, "that's the place!"  There's a house in the town of Progresso, on the Mexican coast, he said, that could be used as a base for trips to the Mayan ruins.  He would, of course, act as guide for the persons fortunate enough to make the trip. 

    Meanwhile, I asked, how are things?

    Well sir, he'd just been over to the blood bank and picked up $4.  He pulled up his sleeves to show the bit of gauze Scotch-taped to the inside of the bend in his arm.  And he was eating, not good but all right, at the missions.

    And after the $4 was gone?

    "If I can't make it on four bucks," he said confidently, "I can't make it!"

    ::
    YESTERDAY a dispatch from Moscow reported that M. Agrest, Soviet scientist, was claiming that visitors from outer space landed in the Libyan Desert at least 1 million years ago and, failing to convey their wisdom to the stupid earth people, blew up the wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah with their excess nuclear fuel before blasting off.

    Tonight Reinhold Schmidt, Bakersfield grain buyer, is scheduled to speak in Pasadena on "My Recent Trips in Spacecraft" if, a press release states, "he returns in time from a flight to the Great Pyramid of Gizeh in Egypt,"  Underneath which, he claims that his friends on Saturn have told him, an ancient space shift is buried.

    A skeptical photog placed these two items on my typewriter with a plaintive note, "Tell me it's so — I want to believe."  I have recommended to his boss that he be taken off the Finch trial.  Obviously he has been there too long and his imagination's gone.

::


    TO ALL THE
people who turned and laughed at seeing three station wagons loaded with youngsters, skis, toboggans, WHEEL CHAIRS and CRUTCHES on San Berdoo Freeway the other day, let Kay Wannell explain.  They were cerebral palsy youngsters who can hardly stand, going to the mountains to enjoy the snow . . . Speaking of which, singer Johnny O'Keefe, here from Australia to record for Liberty, was asked what he'd like to see.  Disneyland?  Nope.  Snow.  There isn't any in Sydney.  He was taken to Big Bear.

::


    CENT-ENARIAN
He lived to be
    one hundred five.
Just why he didn't know.
I'll tell you why he
    stayed alive-
He stashed away his dough.
        JOSEPH P. KRENGEL

::


    AT RANDOM —
How ironical can things get?  At the time fire swept through his apparel plant at 825 S Los Angeles St., Sunday, causing $25,000 damage, owner A.Blum was at home trying to fire up his barbecue.  He had trouble getting it lit . . . Mrs. Clinton Tompkins blinked as she passed an El Monte market that gives trading stamps.  A letter had been deleted from a  sign so that it seemed to offer "Blue Hip."  Probably a cut of meat from the blue hippopotami which have been known to roam the saloons.

Feb. 11, 1960, Abby 

 
Posted in Caryl Chessman, Columnists, Comics, Matt Weinstock, UFOs | Comments Off on Matt Weinstock, Feb. 11, 1960

Paul V. Coates – Confidential File, Feb. 11, 1960

 
Feb. 11, 1960, Mirror Cover

A Woman Pays, Pays and Pays for Nothing

Paul Coates    The word is blackmail, and you don't know what it means until it happens to you.

    Mrs. Anita Roddy-Eden Sutton said it happened to her on the third day following her marriage to actor John Sutton.  That was Feb. 24, 1957.

    She and Sutton were honeymooning at the St. Regis in New York when the phone in their suite rang.

    She lifted the receiver and the man's voice told her, "Good morning , Mrs. Manville.  How do you like being a bigamist?"  That was all the man said.  Then the phone went dead.

    "Who was that calling?"  the actor asked his bride.

    "Nobody," she stammered.  "It was a wrong number."

    But it wasn't.  It was a very right number.  Before her marriage to Sutton, Anita Roddy-Eden had been Tommy Manville's ninth wife.  Their 3 1/2 year union — which had been her first — ended in a Reno divorce in 1955.

Feb. 11, 1960, Finch Trial     Anita hinted there were some possible irregularities.  That's what worried the new Mrs. Sutton.  There was, for example, the possibility that she hadn't fulfilled the six-week Nevada residence requirement — but she had stated in court at the time that she had.  There was a chance that she was guilty of perjury, as well as bigamy.

    This, the mysterious caller knew.  And he told her so when he phoned her again that night.

    "How would you like Mr. Sutton to find out?" he asked.

    The thought terrified her.  The caller apparently knew it would because he set a $10,000 price tag on his silence.  Mrs. Sutton laughed uneasily and asked where she would get that kind of money.  But the caller was too familiar with her financial status to fall for her bluff.  "You've got it," he said.

    She did.  And after a few more persuasive phone calls in the next couple of days, she stuck it in an envelope, wrote — according to instructions — the name "Mr. Forest" on it and left it at the hotel desk.

    She had been assured — as all blackmail victims are — that this would be the only payment she would be required to make. 

    Even at the price, she figured that she was getting off cheap, if the silence would save her new marriage and keep her out of trouble with the Nevada authorities.

Feb. 11, 1960, Finch Trial     Yesterday, Mrs. Sutton recalled for me the strange emotions that tore her after that first $10,000 payment.

    "Whoever was blackmailing me knew an awful lot about me," she said.  "That's what bothered me most.  I'd look at my friends and wonder if they were implicated."

    Three months passed before the blackmailers contacted her again.  They wanted another ten grand.  After some persuasion, she paid a second time.

    But this didn't stop them.  They hit her again in July of '57 for $5,000 more, and in August twice, for $1,000 each time.  Total $27,000.

    "By then," she told me yesterday, "it was driving me half-crazy.  I'd devise little schemes to try to trip them up, to catch them.  But I never succeeded.  The only thing that stopped them was the fact that my husband and I went out of the country."

    The Suttons eventually returned to the U.S. and as the months passed her fears that the blackmailers would reappear diminished.  "Sometimes I'd go days, weeks, without thinking about them."

    But then, last December, her husband opened a note addressed to her which was mixed among a batch of Christmas cards.

    It was from the blackmailers, announcing that they were back — and when John Sutton confronted his wife with it she broke down and told him the whole story.

Secret in Public Domain

    Also the press.  That apparently cost her the sympathy of the district attorney in Reno, William J. Raggio.  He said inspection of the records failed to back up her statement of blackmail and irregularities in the divorce.

    "I can only assume her statement is insincere and issued for the purpose of obtaining publicity," he said, "especially in view of the fact the statements have been made to the press rather than to the officials concerned."

    In any event, Mrs. Sutton's $27,000 secret wasn't a secret anymore.

    "If you had the choice again . . .?"  I started.

    "If I had the choice again, I don't know," she answered.  "I guess I was a fool to pay them the $27,000.

    "But," Anita Roddy-Eden Sutton added, "it bought me three years of silence.  And they were very happy years."

  

Posted in #courts, Columnists, Front Pages, Homicide, Paul Coates | Comments Off on Paul V. Coates – Confidential File, Feb. 11, 1960

The Specials at the Whisky

Feb. 11, 1980, The Specials
Feb. 11, 1980, The Specials 

Feb. 11, 1980: The long-awaited merger of punk and reggae is message, mirth and mayhem, Richard Cromelin says.

Posted in Music, Nightclubs, Rock 'n' Roll | Comments Off on The Specials at the Whisky

A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept.: Your Movie Columnist

Feb. 11, 1949, Hedda Hopper 

Feb. 11, 1949: Wedding bells for Clark Gable and Joan Crawford? Hedda Hopper says no.

Posted in Columnists, Film, Hollywood | Comments Off on A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept.: Your Movie Columnist

Finch Shows How He Cracked Wife’s Skull

 Feb. 10, 1960, Bernard Finch, Carole Tregoff
Photograph by John Malmin / Los Angeles Times

Dr. R. Bernard Finch passes co-defendant Carole Tregoff while returning to his chair after a court recess.

Feb. 11, 1960, Finch Trial
Feb. 11, 1960, Finch Trial
Feb. 11, 1960, Finch Trial
Feb. 11, 1960, Finch Trial

Feb. 11, 1960, Finch Trial
Feb. 11, 1960, Sex Poll

The State Board of Education clears a Van Nuys teacher who was charged with immoral or unprofessional conduct after taking a sex poll of his physiology classes.

Feb. 11, 1960: The transcript of the testimony in the Finch case runs four additional pages. If there’s enough interest I’ll add it, otherwise I’ll omit it. Posting so much material on a daily basis is incredibly time-consuming. 

Posted in #courts, Education, Homicide | 3 Comments

Caring for Stolen Car

Feb. 11, 1920, Briggs

“When a Feller Needs a Friend,” by Clare Briggs. [Note: The issue of child labor is a rare departure for Briggs, who usually kept his material humorous—lrh].

Feb. 11, 1920, Car Theft

Feb. 11, 1920:  Roy Mitchell denies stealing a car. Notice that The Times identified him as a Negro, which was typical in newspapers of the era and was common into the 1940s.

Posted in #courts, art and artists, Comics | Comments Off on Caring for Stolen Car

Woman Refuses to Testify Against Husband in Prostitution Case

Feb. 11, 1910, Ida Densmore
Feb. 11, 1910, Ida Densmore 

Feb. 11, 1910: A.C. Berchtold, onetime head of the police "purity squad," is found hiding in the closet when detectives serve a search warrant on Myrtle Booth. "His costume was not suitable for a polite social call," The Times says.

Posted in #courts, LAPD | Comments Off on Woman Refuses to Testify Against Husband in Prostitution Case

Matt Weinstock, Feb. 10, 1960

Feb. 10, 1960, Peanuts Feb. 10, 1960, Peanuts

The Recollectors

Matt Weinstock     Reading the testimony in the Finch trial, I am again filled with awe and admiration for those who can remember exactly where they were standing and what they were thinking when they heard the fatal shot or what they said at 2:46 p.m. last March 27 in a bar.  Obviously more people than is generally realized have what is known as total recall.

    With me it's the opposite.  I have total lack of recall, even about what happened last Thursday.  If a merciless prosecutor or barrister cracked down on me in the witness chair I'm afraid I could only say weakly, "I don't know" or "I don't remember."  And frankly I'd feel better if more witnesses admitted lack of knowledge or memory once in a while.  I feel all alone in my blankness of recollection.

Feb. 10, 1960, Mother     Of course, a witness is liable to get into trouble if he keeps saying he doesn't know or doesn't remember.  No one, including the judge and jury, will believe that either.

    Clearly it is not the era of absent-minded but rather the epoch of the confessors.

::

    BRIDGE, the card game, is having a revival, and John J. Anthony, the noted marital problem solver, recalls the time in New York he used to play with a sharp group that included playwright George S. Kaufman.

    One night Kaufman drew as a partner a wealthy newcomer who immediately revealed a shocking lack of knowledge of the game.  He bid recklessly, then made silly mistakes.  Kaufman bore up bravely for a while but during a hand when he was dummy he said to his partner, "Tell me, when did you learn this game — and if you say today I want to know what time!"

::

    SUDDEN THOUGHT
Though for my past I've
    nothing but praise.
I was an unremarkable
    boy in many ways.
        SHELDON WHITE

::

    A LADY NAMED Julia confides that the trading stamp madness gets stickier all the time.

    Needing toothpaste the other day, she couldn't decide which of three stores in the same block to go to — the market that gives blue ones, the market that gives light green ones or the drugstore that gives dark green ones.  It was suggested that one way to conquer this indecision was to go to a store that didn't give any.  "Are you crazy?"  Julia said.  "If you don't collect stamps people look at you as if you've lost your mind!"

    The lunacy has also broken out on a couple of other fronts.  A chain letter offering blue stamps is reported making the rounds.  And  a group of Beverly Hills ladies are using them instead of chips in their regular poker games.

::

   A HERMOSA Beach man, Lou Capek, has been going along with MVD director Robert McCarthy's ukase suspending licenses of drunk drivers, but since hearing a judge on TV he is troubled.

image21

    The judge agreed that inebriated  motorists must be kept off the highways and streets but he pointed out that the drunks caused only 6% of accidents whereas speeding drivers were responsible for 30%.  His conclusion was that speeders should be treated at least as harshly.

    Lou, who claims he got an A in his university logic course, reasons, "If 6% of accidents are caused by drunk drivers and 30% by speeders, obviously the greatest percentage of accidents, 64%, is caused by sober, non-speeding drivers.  Therefore, If we are to reduce accidents, sober, non-speeding drivers should have their licenses suspended first.  I am mailing mine to Sacramento right now."

::


    AT RANDOM —
Even more vexing than L.A. freeways, says Walter Tuesley, visiting from Seattle, are the pavement notices, "Ped Xing" . . . It seems to Louis Luk that TV's extended moment of truth has spilled over into the movies.  A trailer for a film about spacemen proclaims it to be "UNBELIEVABLE!" . . . Oops, a torn shade on a Pasadena store makes a sign seem to state, "hotography" . . . And the sports boys are having a field day in their reports on Squaw Valley.  One headline states, "Europeans OK Squaw."  Usually there's no space for "Valley."

Feb. 10, 1960, Abby

Posted in #courts, Columnists, Comics, Matt Weinstock | Comments Off on Matt Weinstock, Feb. 10, 1960

Paul V. Coates – Confidential File, Feb. 10, 1960

Feb. 10, 1960, Mirror Cover

A Pugilist's Destiny Is in His Hands

Paul Coates    I won't kid you.  I'm embarrassed.

    For years I've been writing, here, about the evils of boxing.  If you check the files, you'll see that I've called it a racket infested to its foundations with unscrupulous crooks.

    But now, I'm mired in it as deep as Frankie Carbo and Blinky Palermo.

    I own a fighter.  A 126-pound amateur named Davey Alanis.

    It happened quite suddenly yesterday afternoon when I got a call from Frank Elmquist, a legitimate reporter for an unidentified newspaper who, after hours, engages in little illegitimacies like flacking for the Golden Gloves Tournament which begins tomorrow at the Olympic Auditorium.

     "Paully," he said, in his syrupy, after hours voice, "how'd you like to own a fighter?  Won't cost you a cent."

image      "No man can own another man," I told him curtly.  "It's a basic concept of our democracy that all men–"

    "It's just a  stunt," he interrupted.  "We give you your own fighter so you'll write about him and the tournament gets publicity. Whatta you say, Paully?"

    He hit me where I'm vulnerable.  I can never say no to anyone who calls me "Paully."  Besides, he knew that in my whole life  I had  never, ever really owned anything, or for that matter, anybody, outright.  Everything I have is either mortgaged, rented or gummed up in the confusion of the California community property law.

    "I'll send your boy around to see you so you can get acquainted,"  he said hurriedly.  Then he added, in a voice choked with genuine emotion:  "And Paully, thanks a million.  You're a brick."

    He hung up.  And I sat there staring at the phone.  I was the owner of a fighter.  But what were my responsibilities?  Elmquist never did tell me.

    Later that afternoon, a dapper youngster in fancy gray gabardines came to my office.

    "I'm Davey Alanis,"  he said.  "Frank Elmquist sent me."

   Feb. 10, 1960, Finch Trial I motioned him to a chair.  We sized each other up for a long moment.  I cleared my throat and said, "I guess Elmquist told you all about it, didn't he?"

    "He didn't tell me anything," Davey replied.  "He just said to come over."

    "Oh," I said.  "Well, Davey, I'm your new owner."

    "Okay," Davey replied.

    "Listen, Davey,"  I pleaded after a moment.  "Am I supposed to do something for you?  Like, get you a pair of trunks? Buy you a mouth guard? You got a kimono?"

    "Kimono?"  he asked.

    "Kimono.  Bathrobe.  Whatever you call it.  You got one?"

    "Sure," Davey said.  "I got all that stuff.

     "Well then," I said irritably, "whatta you want?"

    "Nothing," Davey snapped.  "The guy just told me to come over here.  So here I am."

    We stared at each other again.  After an uncomfortable lapse of time, I said:  "You look like a nice kid.  Why do you want to be a fighter?"

    "I like it," he told me.

Feb. 10, 1960, Finch Trial    I walked over and gave him a  paternal pat on the shoulder.  "You know the odds?"  I said gently.  "One guy makes it for every 10,000 who don't.  And when you get to the top, what have you got?"

    "Money, man," Davey replied.

     "Money," I snorted.  "And the mob cuts it up a dozen ways before you see any of it.  And peroxide blonds fawn all over you.  But they don't like you for what you are.  It's who you are.  Is that the shallow existence you want, Davey?"

Kid Allergic to Diving

    "Yeah,"  Davey said.

    I gave my cigar a thoughtful puff and sidled back up to the youth.  "Kid,"  I whispered conspiratorially, "if that's the way you really feel, let me ask you something.  Would you be willing to take a dive?"

    He looked at me in honor.  "That,"  he said disgustedly, "is dishonest."

    And that's my luck, right?  As long as I've been forced into this vicious, unscrupulous racket, you'd think I'll be able to make a fast buck out of it.

    But no.  Not me.  I got to wind up with a Joe Palooka.

 
   

Posted in #courts, Columnists, Homicide | Comments Off on Paul V. Coates – Confidential File, Feb. 10, 1960

Charles Champlin on ‘Cruising’

Feb. 10, 1980, Cruising Feb. 10, 1980, Cruising
Feb. 10, 1980, Cruising 
Feb. 10, 1980, Cruising

Feb. 10, 1980, Cruising Feb. 10, 1980, Cruising 

 

Feb. 10, 1980: Charles Champlin writes, “The principal complaint, artistically, about 'Cruising' is that it is not very clear at the rudimentary level of exposition of character and event. The problem, as with [William] Friedkin's 'Sorcerer,' which he also wrote himself, is in a script that never seems sure enough what it wants to say or prove.”

Posted in #gays and lesbians, Film, Hollywood | 1 Comment

A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept.: Your Film, 1965

Feb. 10, 1965, Creature Feature 

Now showing, a Peter Cushing double feature: “Curse of Frankenstein” and “Horror of Dracula.” 
Feb. 10, 1965: Also opening, “Two on a Guillotine.” Directed by William Conrad!

Posted in Film, Hollywood | Comments Off on A Kinder, Simpler Time Dept.: Your Film, 1965

Recalling the Days of Payola

Feb. 18, 1960, Payola 

Norm Prescott I was  "blown away" today to see my dad on the front page of the Mirror News. My dad, Norm Prescott, was a big DJ in Boston and New York. We all moved to Los Angeles in 1966.

The guys who got the most amount of press in this congressional investigation, were of course, Dick Clark and Alan Freed. This scandal ruined Freed, and we all know about Dick Clark.

But my dad pointed out, that at the time, payola was actually legal! There were no laws for a time in the 1950's about DJs taking payola. There were trips to Florida, I'm sure there was money, too. But as my dad always pointed out….he 'declared' all his gifts with the IRS. He might have been the only jock to do so! That's why he was never fined or indicted. Others weren't so lucky.

I went on to a long career in radio as well———-I only WISH I was offered payola. (Which in the present era wasn't in the form of money.  Trips…..yes.  Radio station promotion money–yes.

I can't say any more—I'll have to check on the statute of limitations!

Jeff Prescott, La Jolla

 

Note: After coming to Los Angeles, Norm Prescott was one of the founders of Filmation. He died in 2005 at the age of 78.

Photo of Norman Prescott courtesy of the Prescott family

Posted in broadcasting, Film, Hollywood, Obituaries | Comments Off on Recalling the Days of Payola

Finch Trial Focuses on Victim’s Will

Feb. 10, 1960, Carole Tregoff 
Photograph by John Malmin / Los Angeles Times

[Update: Feb. 10, 1960: Carole Tregoff wears a pink sweater her mother made for her because the courtroom was so cold].

image
Feb. 10, 1960, Finch Trial
Feb. 10, 1960, Finch Trial
Feb. 10, 1960, Finch Trial

Feb. 10, 1960, Finch Trial
Feb. 10, 1960, Finch Trial
Feb. 10, 1960, Finch Trial

Feb. 10, 1960: Q: Now let me ask you this, Dr. Finch, in discussing your plans for the future with her, and particularly when you started discussing the rental of this apartment, did either of you ever suggest that adultery was wrong, and that you might both use self-control and wait until you both had divorces before indulging in sexual relationship?

A. No, sir.

Posted in #courts, Homicide | Comments Off on Finch Trial Focuses on Victim’s Will