From the Vaults: ‘The Brides of Dracula’ (1960)

Brides We continue last week's gore theme with, at last, a Hammer Films selection!

Hammer is, of course, the British production company known for its high-gothic horror films, made between the 1950s and 1970s, and often involving elaborate costumes, lots of movie fog, candelabras, swooning damsels and copious amounts of rather orangey blood.

I was all excited to write about Christopher Lee, but when "Brides of Dracula" arrived I discovered that he's not in this one; which makes sense, since his character (that's Dracula, kids) is killed at the end of the preceding Hammer film, 1958's "Horror of Dracula."

Fortunately, he was to be revived in "Dracula: Prince of Darkness" (1966) and many other ensuing Hammer films (my favorite being "Dracula Has Risen From The Grave" — I love that title! I mean, what else does Dracula do?).

But with "Brides" we're on our own, star-power-wise, with Peter Cushing as Dr. Van Helsing, and that turns out to be quite a fine thing indeed.

"Brides of Dracula" opens as a carriage rushes through a forest, and a voiceover informs us that we are in Transylvania. Although Dracula is dead, the voiceover tells us, his "cult" persists. Then we meet Marianne (Yvonne Monlaur), our resident damsel, and through her viewpoint we're plunged into an entirely new, Dracula-style story of frightened innkeepers, terrified coachmen and spooky old castles. Marianne ends up in the castle of Baroness Meinster (Martita Hunt), who's keeping her own son (David Peel) captive; the son gets ahold of Marianne, explains to her that he's the rightful Baron, and convinces her to free him. Next thing we know, the baroness is dead and so is a local peasant wench. Oh dear!

I got so caught up in this storyline that I forgot about poor Cushing entirely, but eventually he does show up. Van Helsing has been summoned by locals who were already concerned about the Meinster situation even before the Baron got out. The good doctor rescues Marianne from the woods, where she has been fleeing the Meinster castle, and drops her off at the girls' school where she teaches. Then he repairs back to the local inn for a drink with the village priest. Together they diagnose the problem as vampirism, brought on by the Baron! Will Van Helsing defeat the undead?

What kind of question is that? Does a damsel faint in the woods?

BridesvampThis movie (directed by Hammer legend Terence Fisher, who helmed "Horror of Dracula" as well as many of the studio's Frankenstein movies) does some interesting things to the Dracula mythos.

Van Helsing explains to the village priest that vampirism is a sickness that's partly physical, partly spiritual, and is based around a cult that expressly rejects Christianity. I sort of don't know about that… yeah, every modern Dracula story has to explain why vampires are allergic to crosses and holy water, but a cult? I would just think a cult would be more organized: at least organized enough to take out someone like Van Helsing, who clearly poses a threat. But this is a minor quibble.

The important thing is that these lines are being delivered by Peter Cushing, who gets to own the movie without a great Dracula figure to oppose (Peel does his best, but my heavens, look at the fellow). Cushing's Van Helsing is captivating. He's calm but resolute, always capable, and even sexy in his thin-lipped, razor-cheekboned way; in the end, he even gets the girl! (Although he's clear that his intentions are only professional, which is even sexier.)

BridescushingI love how unflappable he is even in the midst of all the bosom-heaving, bat-attacking, candelabra-hurling classic-Hammer  action. Cushing refuses to let the melodrama drag him down, and his dignity carries the film. (This is an odd comparison, but it reminded me a bit of Ossie Davis' brilliant showing in "Bubba Ho-Tep." One heartfelt performance can elevate high camp into something even higher.) Plus Cushing gets to do sweet stunts, hanging from a windmill and swinging from a rope. He wears incredibly well-cut suits, too. And did I mention he gets the girl?

This movie just worked for me. Most of the other Hammer Dracula films have to concoct an elaborate explanation of why Dracula survived his previous death, and they become increasingly campy, but this standalone vampire story hangs together nicely. There are some super-nice set pieces; I enjoyed one in which the coffin of a likely-soon-to-be-vampire is left in a stable, and the horses stamp and knock against their stalls, drowning out the waking vampire's knocks on the coffin sides. And there are enough candelabras and frightened peasants to satisfy any Hammer fan.

My only real beef is with the girls' school setting. A fair amount of the movie takes place in Marianne's school, and indeed her colleague Gina (Andree Melly) becomes one of the titular Brides.

But the possibilities of a vampire running amok in a girls' school — well, I hate to say it, but they could have been exploited a lot more. You barely see the students at all. It just seems a waste.

Finally, the takeaway lesson of this movie: If you need to cauterize a wound on your own neck, be sure and get a friend to help. It's tricky to do alone!

Next week: Lon Chaney Sr. helps class things up around here.

— Anne Elisabeth Dillon

Images, from top: I love how the poster uses "Dracula" as a synonym for "vampire"; David Peel demonstrates that a blond vampire is like a blond Bond — a bit chancy; and Peter Cushing prepares to go Moff Tarkin on an unruly vampire.

Unknown's avatar

About lmharnisch

I am retired from the Los Angeles Times
This entry was posted in Film, From the Vaults, Hollywood. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to From the Vaults: ‘The Brides of Dracula’ (1960)

  1. fibber mcgee's avatar fibber mcgee says:

    Whut? No comments on this “bosom-heaving, bat-attacking, candelabra-hurling classic-Hammer action?” What he-man or she-gal can resist such fare? Personally I prefer Abbott and Costello being chased by Revolutionary War ghosts, but whatever floats your oil recovery boat. And bosom-heaving is always welcome.

    Like

  2. Fabulous movie – one of Hammer’s best Gothic’s.
    You want vampires running amok in a girl’s school? Well, Hammer eventually granted your wish – try ‘Lust for a Vampire’ (1971). On second thoughts, maybe don’t. Not Hammer’s finest hour!

    Like

  3. Thanks for reminding us of this great contribution to Horror vampire films. It’s surely no Horror of Dracula, but with the great Peter Cushing as Van Helsing in the Gothic tradition it is a good film.

    Like

  4. AED's avatar AED says:

    Thanks for the love, Fibber & John!
    WH, how could a vampire movie possibly go wrong with a director named Sangster?

    Like

  5. What I find really interesting about this movie is that it’s a sequel to “Horror of Dracula,” but instead of focusing on Dracula, it focuses on his adversary, Van Helsing. It’s much the same as the Hammer films did with their Frankenstein series, focusing on Dr. Frankenstein instead of the Monster (as the earlier horror movies of Universal Pictures had done). But as you mention, Christopher Lee returned as Dracula for the next film in the vampire series, remaining in the role until 1973’s forgettable “Count Dracula and His Vampire Brides” – which also co-starred Cushing, an actor of class and dignity even in the worst of films. He was a damn good Sherlock Holmes, too!

    Like

Comments are closed.