| April 13, 1920: “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde'” at the Million Dollar Theatre… Not for weaklings and mollycoddles! – with Jesse Crawford at the Organ. |
|
Note: Since we began in 2007, the Daily Mirror has wanted to provide posts about historic films, but like the rest of the DM, we wanted to make it a unique, personal view. We found a fresh, original voice in Anne Elisabeth Dillon, who works around the corner from us on the National copy desk. Please welcome her — lrh
At first it's just a blast to sit down and watch a movie from 1920. The lighting flickers like a lantern – I kept thinking how great it would look projected on the wall of a nightclub. The costumes are exquisite. Everyone wears fabulous eyeliner. Also, this was my first John Barrymore movie, and yummm… he was called the Great Profile, but he is truly beauteous from all angles. So tall and regal! And the title cards have gorgeous Art Deco-style designs on them. Dr. Jekyll has some out-there scientific ideas, but morally speaking he is extremely virtuous, what with running a low-income medical establishment (the shots of Edinburgh's poor, standing around his waiting room hoping for affordable healthcare, are shockingly familiar, even with the abundance of picturesque shawls) and being engaged to the good and kind Millicent. Millicent's dad, Sir George (Brandon Hurst, who is no slouch himself in the profile department) is a good friend of Dr. Jekyll's and takes him out for a night at the dance hall. There we meet dancer Gina, who is dangerously Italian – we deduce, from her one-shouldered outfit, that she is not so virtuous as Millicent. Dr. J. is fascinated by her, and shortly thereafter gets cracking on his famous potion. |
Dr. Jekyll's first transformation into Hyde is incredibly impressive. The camera stays on him as he convulses and gradually turns into his hideous, all-id alter ego. In his wonderful book “The Monster Show,” Hollywood historian David J. Skal writes that Barrymore applied his own makeup between convulsions, and if that is true my hat is off to the man. I can barely put on decent eyeliner in the car when it's parked.
Hyde is genuinely alarming-looking: leering, hollow-eyed, malevolent. Barrymore's full-body work is just incredible as he shifts from Jekyll's regal carriage to Hyde's spidery hunchback walk. Every gesture is deliberate – it's like watching a ballet.
There's a great bit toward the end when Hyde pounces on Jekyll's best friend, in what ultimately turns out to be a lethal attack: He's like an animal or a little kid, all gangly arms and legs, merrily waving his walking stick like it's a deadly toy. And the transformational convulsions are pretty violent – this was clearly not an easy part to play. Skal writes that Barrymore was simultaneously playing the also-hunchbacked Richard III onstage in New York, and had to go away and rest in a sanitarium after it was all over. I certainly cannot blame him.
My favorite part comes shortly after the midpoint of the movie. Hyde has seduced Gina and then thrown her over — just because he's a jerk and can do that, I guess. He visits one of his underground haunts and begins his seduction routine on a new girl, pawing her shoulders and clavicle that's actually rather shocking considering the time period.
Gina, who's fallen on hard times, notices him in the bar and taps on his shoulder, apparently hoping to shame him. But Hyde's not a man, he's a monster!
Grinning maniacally, he grabs both ladies and hauls them over to a mirror, forcing Gina to look head-on at her own ruination. Then with his hideous long fingers, he strokes the younger girl's perfect cheekbone, and gestures toward the ruined Gina — forcing one to contemplate her present and the other, her future. Hyde holds them like that for a moment and then, cackling, ditches them both and heads into the street, pausing in the doorway for a contemptuous lift of his hat (from his ridiculously pointy head). He knows that ruination and decay lie within us all. Hyde is a villain who is thoroughly self-aware.
I also dug Jekyll's patterned dressing-gown. Want!
–Anne Elisabeth Dillon
Images, from top: Saintly Dr. Jekyll tends to one of Edinburgh's downtrodden; one of the early title cards; Hyde forces two women to look at themselves. Courtesy Famous Players-Lasky Corp., Paramount Pictures.
Oh, the joys of silent film! Interesting to read the piece by someone who is obviously unfamiliar with that particular medium but can appreciate its story telling value.
For Angelenos of a certain age, this will surely bring back memories of going to the old silent movie theatre on Fairfax Avenue with their parents, seeing what THEY saw as youngsters in the silent movie days. Once you accustomed yourself to the techniques of the era,the movies were really amazing: enjoyable, gorgeous to watch (all those flimsy-looking sets in the ‘teens that gave way to the more elaborate constructions of the ‘twenties)& a lesson in the early days of on-camera acting (how over-the-top could things get?)and a technology that advanced by leaps and bounds, dependent only upon the creativity of the early film makers.
LikeLike
I too remember the joys of The Silent Movie Theater on Fairfax. It was mom and pop run in the mid sixties when I first stumbled upon it. Mom would sell the tickets, and pop would run the projection. The seats were wooden, and the feint scent of mildew sprinkled the air. The prints were well-worn sixteen millimeter, and the music had little to no relationship to the images.
But oh what images!
Purely visual storytelling, developed to its highest art by the time sound came in. That little theater in the Jewish district was a film school all to itself. Especially true before the advent of the AFI and home video.
Much of my education in film art came to me through the gentle proprietors of The Silent Movie Theater.
LikeLike