Paul Coates

Jan. 23, 1958

Paul_coatesThere’s an old saying that I frequently call upon which goes:

"Omnia vincit amor."

It means "Love conquers all"–and I think it’s pretty applicable to what’s going to happen to the U.S. Marines.

I
think so because, shortly after dusk last night, I was invaded by some
dozen wives of the corps. And I can truthfully say that I think the
shores of Tripoli fared better than I did.

The women were, in mild English, disgruntled. In stronger English, angered. Or in corps English, fighting mad.

–Not, fortunately, at me.

They were mad, generally, at the Marine Corps; more specifically, at a four-star general named Randolph McCall Pate.

Pate,
according to their unanimous complaint, is standing between them and
their husbands. He, as corps commandant, is responsible for an official
order to break up their homes.

He stands accused of:

1–Forcing
the wives out of Japan or from going to Japan to be with their Marine
husbands because their presence would "interfere with the combat
readiness" of their spouses.

2–Permitting undemocratic
disciplinary measures to be taken against Marines whose wives refused
to bow to the order, including actual expulsion from the corps.

1958_0123_bookies
And
3–Suggesting to those Marines whose wives were forcibly separated from
them that they could satisfy their natural desires by making discreet use of
the female talent available in Japan.

I’ll leave it to your
imagination to figure out the collective state of mind of the dozen
women who established a beachhead in my office last night.

One spoke freely of her fears of divorce.

"During
my husband’s six years in the corps, we’ve only been together three of
them," she said. "It’s at a point now where we’ve got to get back
together soon or–or we’re through. We’ve got problems which are too
big to solve when we’re a long ocean apart."

Another spoke: "We
wives got the order to leave when I was in Japan with my husband. My
husband and I owned our house there and owned our car–because we knew
he had more than a year of duty left in Japan.

"I was one of
some 20% of the wives who refused to go away. I had my passport and my
visa and I had every legal right as a U.S. citizen to stay. So what did
the brass do?

"They changed my husband’s orders–shipped him
out. Then, after 15 years with an excellent record as a Marine, he was
forced out of the corps."

Each wife had a story, different in detail but in general the same.

I
listened, I think, to every one of them. And I was told that if I
wanted to hear more, there were three dozen other women ready to talk.

Including one, they added, who received an anonymous phone call last night warning her to keep her mouth shut.

Before they filed out, they asked me to include a couple of important points in whatever I wrote.

The
first was that there are 92,000 military dependents in Japan, that all
other branches of U.S. military service permit their personnel to have
their families with them and that by Defense Department edict, overseas
treatment of military dependents is supposed to be going through
standardization process.

"But Pate hasn’t started to do anything
about it yet," one wife complained. "He sees nothing wrong with taking
his own wife on a tour of the Far East with him, but when the order
would permit us to go, he asks noncompliance."

The second point
was that Marines who marry in Japan–whether to Oriental girls or
American ones–are permitted to keep their families there.

"They
discriminate against us because of the geographical location of our
marriage vows," complained another. "If I divorce my husband and go to
Japan to remarry him, that’s all right."

The women told me that
most of them had already written their congressmen, and that they
wanted other interested citizens to do the same.

When they left, I had the definite impression that this was one military campaign which Gen. Pate wasn’t going to win.

   
   

Unknown's avatar

About lmharnisch

I am retired from the Los Angeles Times
This entry was posted in Columnists, Paul Coates. Bookmark the permalink.