1944 in Print — Life Magazine, July 17, 1944

July 17, 1944

The pretty girl in peasant clothes on this week’s cover is Anne Scott from Columbus, Ohio. Anne has been modeling ever since her graduation from Ohio State University nearly five years ago. Although she has posed for several cover sketches, this is her first photographic cover.

July 17, 1944

Pleasant blouses and skirts are what fashionable young women are wearing these days. Fashion note: The Wartime Production Board has banned the previously popular dirndls and stipulated that no blouse could have more than one ruffle per sleeve. No more ruffles until it’s over, over there!

Notice the cover price of 10 cents an issue and  $4.50 a year, or $1.35 an issue and $60.80 a year in 2014 dollars.

Corsican residents punish three women for consorting with the Nazis: Their heads are shaved, they are stripped of their clothes and forced to leave town, something similar to what will happen in France.

The movie of the week is “Two Girls,” starring June Allyson and Gloria DeHaven.

And the “Greatest Generation” took cat pictures

Scanned by Google Books.

Emmet Kelly hauls water at the July 6, 1944, circus tent fire in Hartford, Conn.

July 17, 1944, Long Distance Calls

Dear millennials: Before the breakup of Ma Bell, cellphones and cheap minutes, long-distance calls on landlines were expensive. Please limit your calls to 5 minutes.

July 17, 1944, Plymouth

This Corsican woman got off relatively well. She she was shorn and stripped naked she was allowed to keep a coat. The other women were not so fortunate.


About these ads

About lmharnisch

I work at the Los Angeles Times
This entry was posted in 1944, Animals, Fashion, Film, Hollywood, World War II and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to 1944 in Print — Life Magazine, July 17, 1944

  1. Eve says:

    My mother loved that look: she had a tiny little waistline in the ’40s and looked terrific in that, and in the wasp-waisted New Look a few years later. Boy, was she miserable in the 1960s–that sheath mini-dress look was NOT flattering to short women in their forties.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s